"Challenging those who dismiss realism as a basis for an experimental anthropological cinema, Grimshaw (liberal arts, Emory Univ.) and Ravetz (art and design, Manchester Metropolitan Univ., UK) argue that the text-based (or textual) and conceptual ethnographic film imposes meaning on its subjects rather than drawing it from them in the process of filming. Arguing from the works of André Bazin, Colin Young, Herb Di Gioia, and others, the authors make a case for continuous long shots, respectful engagement with subjects, a humanistic perspective that values the quotidian of people's lives, and a reluctance to indulge in pre-information about the subject matter of films' targeted topics. ...More about filmmaking than anthropology, this short book is apparently a response to poststructuralist critiques of interpretive anthropology and its conceptual frameworks. Aiming for a universalist argument of letting film audiences become participants in evolving meaning, the authors reiterate their litany of observational practice and camera to argue for ethnography by filmmaking rather than films that are ethnographic. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. —Choice"

Challenging those who dismiss realism as a basis for an experimental anthropological cinema, Grimshaw (liberal arts, Emory Univ.) and Ravetz (art and design, Manchester Metropolitan Univ., UK) argue that the text-based (or textual) and conceptual ethnographic film imposes meaning on its subjects rather than drawing it from them in the process of filming. Arguing from the works of André Bazin, Colin Young, Herb Di Gioia, and others, the authors make a case for continuous long shots, respectful engagement with subjects, a humanistic perspective that values the quotidian of people's lives, and a reluctance to indulge in pre-information about the subject matter of films' targeted topics. ...More about filmmaking than anthropology, this short book is apparently a response to poststructuralist critiques of interpretive anthropology and its conceptual frameworks. Aiming for a universalist argument of letting film audiences become participants in evolving meaning, the authors reiterate their litany of observational practice and camera to argue for ethnography by filmmaking rather than films that are ethnographic. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. —Choice

Grimshaw and Ravetz not only demonstrate felicitous linkages between visual and social anthropology, which is highly welcomed, but between anthropological gazes and artistic visions. We need more of these kinds of expanded multidisciplinary works for they break new ground and expand the space of imagination.

Grimshaw and Ravetz not only demonstrate felicitous linkages between visual and social anthropology, which is highly welcomed, but between anthropological gazes and artistic visions. We need more of these kinds of expanded multidisciplinary works for they break new ground and expand the space of imagination.

Challenging those who dismiss realism as a basis for an experimental anthropological cinema, Grimshaw (liberal arts, Emory Univ.) and Ravetz (art and design, Manchester Metropolitan Univ., UK) argue that the text-based (or textual) and conceptual ethnographic film imposes meaning on its subjects rather than drawing it from them in the process of filming. Arguing from the works of André Bazin, Colin Young, Herb Di Gioia, and others, the authors make a case for continuous long shots, respectful engagement with subjects, a humanistic perspective that values the quotidian of people's lives, and a reluctance to indulge in pre-information about the subject matter of films' targeted topics. ...More about filmmaking than anthropology, this short book is apparently a response to poststructuralist critiques of interpretive anthropology and its conceptual frameworks. Aiming for a universalist argument of letting film audiences become participants in evolving meaning, the authors reiterate their litany of observational practice and camera to argue for ethnography by filmmaking rather than films that are ethnographic. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. —Choice