5
1
Confidentiality, Transparency, and the U.S. Civil Justice System
258
by Joseph W. Doherty, Robert T. Reville, Laura Zakaras
Joseph W. Doherty
Confidentiality, Transparency, and the U.S. Civil Justice System
258
by Joseph W. Doherty, Robert T. Reville, Laura Zakaras
Joseph W. Doherty
Hardcover
$155.00
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
155.0
In Stock
Overview
The lawsuit is the cornerstone of the civil justice system in America, and an open court the foundation of American jurisprudence. In a public setting, we resolve disputes, determine liability, and compensate injuries. In recent decades, however, more civil disputes have been resolved out of court and the outcomes have been kept secret. Fewer than 5 percent of the tens of millions of injury claims annually are actually resolved through a public trial with a jury, and the vast majority are settled out of court or through private forums, such as mediation or arbitration, with undisclosed terms. Some argue that the confidentiality of the system keeps it working efficiently and fairly; others argue that the public is being denied information about hazards that may cause harm and that a public system with no data lacks oversight.
This collection of essays by leading legal scholars is the first book to approach the issue in a multidisciplinary, nonpartisan, and empirical manner. The essays provide empirical analyses and case studies of the impact of greater disclosure on various aspects of the system, ranging from settlement values to fraud, and propose several novel prescriptions for reform. With special attention to the emergence of modern mass litigation, the authors identify a number of benefits to increasing access to information, including decreased fraud, improved public understanding and confidence in the system, and lower transactions costs. The authors make policy recommendations—such as expanding access to existing databases and using technology to create new databases—that increase transparency while protecting the need for privacy.
This collection of essays by leading legal scholars is the first book to approach the issue in a multidisciplinary, nonpartisan, and empirical manner. The essays provide empirical analyses and case studies of the impact of greater disclosure on various aspects of the system, ranging from settlement values to fraud, and propose several novel prescriptions for reform. With special attention to the emergence of modern mass litigation, the authors identify a number of benefits to increasing access to information, including decreased fraud, improved public understanding and confidence in the system, and lower transactions costs. The authors make policy recommendations—such as expanding access to existing databases and using technology to create new databases—that increase transparency while protecting the need for privacy.
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780199914333 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
| Publication date: | 04/24/2012 |
| Pages: | 258 |
| Product dimensions: | 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 0.90(d) |
About the Author
Joseph W. Doherty is the Director of the Empirical Research Group (ERG) at the UCLA School of Law and the co-Director of the UCLA-RAND Center for Law and Public Policy. He teaches Empirical Legal Studies at UCLA Law. He has co-authored research on bankruptcy with Lynn LoPucki, on the living wage with Richard Sander, on negotiation strategy with Russell Korobkin, on international criminal law with Máximo Langer and Richard Steinberg, on employment discrimination with Gary Blasi, and on administrative law with Jody Freeman. Professor Doherty has also published articles on voting behaviour and campaign finance. He has a Ph.D. in political science from UCLA.
Robert Reville is a Senior Economist at RAND whose research focuses on insurance and compensation for accidents and injuries. From 2002 to 2008, he served as director of the RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ). During his tenure as director, ICJ started new research streams on corporate ethics and governance and on entrepreneurship. In addition, Dr. Reville founded and co-directed the RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy, and research from this center was acknowledged as critical in the Congressional decision to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act in 2005 and 2007. He has led a series of studies at RAND on workplace injury compensation policy and the impact of disability on employment, and several recommendations from his work were adopted in reform legislation in California in 2004. He served on the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention until 2009. He received his Ph.D. in Economics from Brown University.
Laura Zakaras is a senior Communications Analyst at RAND and director of the RAND Research Communications Group, which consists of communications specialists who work with multidisciplinary research teams to help them communicate effectively with policymakers. As the Communications Director for RAND's Law, Business, and Regulation division, she has contributed to the clarity and accessibility of many publications and developed dissemination strategies for reaching diverse audiences. Before coming to RAND, she taught writing and literature at a number of universities in the United States and Europe, including the University of Texas at Austin; the University of Maryland, European Division; and Wurzburg University in Germany. She holds a Ph.D. in English from the University of Washington.
Robert Reville is a Senior Economist at RAND whose research focuses on insurance and compensation for accidents and injuries. From 2002 to 2008, he served as director of the RAND Institute for Civil Justice (ICJ). During his tenure as director, ICJ started new research streams on corporate ethics and governance and on entrepreneurship. In addition, Dr. Reville founded and co-directed the RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy, and research from this center was acknowledged as critical in the Congressional decision to renew the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act in 2005 and 2007. He has led a series of studies at RAND on workplace injury compensation policy and the impact of disability on employment, and several recommendations from his work were adopted in reform legislation in California in 2004. He served on the Board of Scientific Counselors of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention until 2009. He received his Ph.D. in Economics from Brown University.
Laura Zakaras is a senior Communications Analyst at RAND and director of the RAND Research Communications Group, which consists of communications specialists who work with multidisciplinary research teams to help them communicate effectively with policymakers. As the Communications Director for RAND's Law, Business, and Regulation division, she has contributed to the clarity and accessibility of many publications and developed dissemination strategies for reaching diverse audiences. Before coming to RAND, she taught writing and literature at a number of universities in the United States and Europe, including the University of Texas at Austin; the University of Maryland, European Division; and Wurzburg University in Germany. She holds a Ph.D. in English from the University of Washington.
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTIONPART I. STUDIES USING EXISTING DATABASES OR NOVEL DATA COLLECTION
CHAPTER 1. Secrecy, Settlements and Medical Malpractice Litigation (Eric Helland & Gia Lee)
CHAPTER 2. Shedding Light on Outcomes in Class Actions (Nicholas M. Pace & William Rubenstein)
CHAPTER 3. Expectations, Outcomes and Fairness: Lessons from the Civil Justice Reform Act Evaluation (Stephen Carroll & Joseph W. Doherty)
PART II: CASE STUDIES
CHAPTER 4. Transparency in the Victim Compensation Fund (Jeremiah Goulka & Robert Reville)
CHAPTER 5. Understanding Mass Tort Defendant Incentives for Confidential Settlements: Lessons from Bayer's Cerivastatin Litigation Strategy (James Anderson)
CHAPTER 6. Transparency and Expert Evidence in Mass Torts: Insight from Silica Litigation (Lloyd Dixon & Stephen Carroll)
PART III: REFORM PROPOSALS
CHAPTER 7. Transparency for Civil Settlements: NASDAQ for Lawsuits? (Stephen Yeazell)
CHAPTER 8. The Future of Court System Transparency (Lynn M. LoPucki)
CHAPTER 9. Transparency Through Insurance: Mandates Dominate Discretion (Tom Baker)
REFERENCES
From the B&N Reads Blog
Page 1 of