- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Most Helpful Favorable Review
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was Columbus the first to discover America?
This book is not a book that someone can just pick up and read for fun. It absolutely changes the reader's image of the time period of discovery. The writing in the book consists of his search for evidence and what he, Gacin Menzies, deduced from what he found. After reading this I would recommend this book to any student wanting to learn more about this period of discovery. It will change any reader's thinking on what they have learned in history classes they have taken.
posted by 2388851 on December 9, 2009Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Most Helpful Critical Review
4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.
OK, but what about "America BC"?
In reading this, I was immediately compelled to ask why it is that there is, in ...
In reading this, I was immediately compelled to ask why it is that there is, in fact, and abundance of evidence that present-day America, for example, was visited and colonized by the ancient Celts, a prehistoric megalithic stone culture, the 6th or 7th century Irish, the Norse, the ancient Portuguese and many others. Anyone who is fascinated by the subject of pre-Columbian cultural diffusion knows these well, especially if like me they live here in New England. Scattered all around New England are ancient stone buildings, unexplained stone beehive structures, stone megalithic constructs, epigrams in stone in ostensibly ancient languages, and on and on. Areas in the Midwest are similarly mysteriously filled with highly-compelling evidence of trans-oceanic travel many hundreds of years before Columbus.
The author of 1421 ignores these entirely in order to make his "discoveries" more dramatic. However, his enthusiasm is laudable and any mass-marketed introduction to the general subject of Pre-Columbian exploration of the Americas is a welcome one, especially for those who, like me, have studied this question and can only but conclude that conventional history and archaeology is tragically wrong in this regard.
But, again, the evidence the author of 1421 provides is scant and not set forth in any appreciable detail whatsoever. In contrast, a rogue Harvard professor, Barry Fell, wrote "America BC" in the 1970's and was instantly branded a quack and accused of being "unscientific" in his inquiry. The book is a startlingly compelling, almost haunting, argument for travel to present-day America many hundreds of years before Columbus, and even long before the birth of Christ. The irony is that if you read Fell's work you will walk away utterly amazed by the extent to which he fleshes out his analysis, utilizes objective evidence, and the meticulous detail with which he reached his conclusions.
Granted, some of Fell's theories were not as strong as others, but Fell's work makes 1421 look like it was written by an undergraduate college student for his senior thesis, by contrast. As to why it has not been republished and re-marketed ever since it was first released 30 years ago, I have utterly no idea.
The success of 1421, in contrast, just goes to show what good marketing of a book combined with an audience's lack of knowledge of a general subject can accomplish. Again, though, menzies is to be applauded for his work and it is a highly approachable book.
I highly suggest that anyone who has read Menzies' 1421 should also read "America BC." And, "Columbus was Last" is a decent primer on the subject, too.
posted by Massattorney on October 25, 2008Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted October 8, 2009
Not So Good
This book is very poorly written. The evidence used to support the opinion of Menzies is very poor. I don't recommend to anyone
2 out of 4 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted November 29, 2008
No proof whatsoever
This book is 100% imagination at work.<BR/><BR/>No footnotes of worth, no documentations, NO PROOF for any of the many whimsical assumptions made by the author.<BR/><BR/>You have to at least provide a list of sources that provide insight to your interpretation of the facts as you see them. <BR/><BR/>FAIL.
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted December 5, 2011
AP World History Review: An Interesting theory, not well written
The book, 1421: The Year China Discovered America, is an interesting theory about the Chinese reaching parts of America almost 75 years before Columbus's famous trek to America in 1492. The idea is very Interesting, and that is why I picked the book up in the first place, but after I started reading, I wished that I hadn't.
By the time I got past about the first page, everything that I hoped the book would be, went totally wrong. The facts seemed to be a little off, and the writing was terrible. The whole idea was cool, and if it was written by a better writer, it could have and would have been a better book
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted June 11, 2010
I Also Recommend:
This book is a joke
If this was fiction, I would applaud. Alas it is not. This is like claiming that the Da Vinci Code is for real. While there was most certainly a Treasure Fleet, led by a colorful Muslim eunuch Zheng He, the fleet never rounded the Cape of Good Hope. While records of the fleet were destroyed this does not provide grounds to prove that Chinese ships reached the Americas. Menzies has no evidence. He supposes several "WHAT IF...?" questions, and musters physical evidence worthy of your typical Atlantis hunter. To boot, Menzies READS NO CHINESE. I am not quite sure how one does researching in Ming China with no Chinese, but there you go.
This book is great if you are unconcerned with the truth or history, and just want to read a fun book. This is about as factual as Jules Verne's Sci-Fi classic From the Earth to the Moon.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted January 3, 2004