Gift Guide
Customer Reviews for

A Republic, Not an Empire: Reclaiming America's Destiny

Average Rating 3.5
( 15 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 1, 2003

    Buchanan as Moderate

    ¿At the opening of the twentieth century there were five great western empires-the British, French, Russian, German, and Austro-Hungarian and two emerging great powers: Japan and the United States. By Century¿s end, all of the empires had disappeared. How did they perish? By war-all of them.¿ (page3) Thus Pat Buchanan begins his book, A Republic, Not An Empire. The book is Buchanan¿s way of redefining himself and to broaden his appeal. When it first came out the media trashed it. Both the conservative as well as the liberal reviews panned in on the World War II chapter and found the book unacceptable. On the heels of Brokaw¿s The Greatest Generation, Buchanan¿s book making a case that there was no need for the United States to have gotten involved in the war took away from the egotistical, feel good , self aggrandizing mood. The media spoke about nothing else except this chapter, which argued Russia and England had already stopped the Nazi advance and that Japan was pushed into the war by the U.S. oil embargo. He says the embargo was already a declaration of ¿economic war against an oil-starved nation,¿ a nation simply looking out for its ¿national interests,¿ which was empire building in Asia. To Buchanan this all makes sense because he has just prior to this, for over 285 pages made the case that America¿s own empire building was perfectly justified. Only he does not call the continental encroachment empire building, but uses the more traditional term ¿manifest destiny,¿ insisting that they are not the same thing. Buchanan almost pulls it off. His depiction of American history, bolstered by quotes from historians, presidents, and other major political figures separates American history into a more or less isolationist camp identified with George Washington and a later empire stage begun by McKinley and advanced by Woodrow Wilson. This hair splitting even seems sensible to a point, if only because it is not quite as mad as the present policy which is in a new war each time you blink. I appreciate the effort Buchanan has made here. He recognizes that it is war and over extension that is the primary problem. He recognizes that when it comes to building an empire there is really no place for a Democratic Republic. These are not realizations that are easy to come by for many people who think of themselves as Conservatives. But Buchanan is wrong. It is not the national interest that¿s important but the conscience of each individual, the dream of true liberty which is to free the mind from the umbilical cord of one¿s own making. The national interest is the great lie, the first rationalization made by the power mad, a cloak for the drive toward conquest and empire. It is an age old story, the attempt to convince people to find answers in the words of their leaders rather than in the depths of our own hearts and souls.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1