- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Anonymous
Posted September 2, 2007
Highly sensible
The AHA No-Fad Diet, like what it says is just that - a no-fad diet. This diet is recommended for people with cardiovascular diseases and heart issues, and is promoted by the American Heart Association. it is not necessarily, however, that sensible for people with what are considered 'limiting conditions' such as diabetes. (For those, consult with the American Diabetic Association (ADA). they can offer suggestions for what to do for the diabetic condition.) For people with heart issues, including cardiovascular disease and histories of heart attacks, this is a fully sensible approach that offers quality, tasteful foods to help reduce your risks of furthering your cardiac conditions by losing unnecessary weight, reducing sodium intakes, and still having delicious and enjoyable foods, wthout all the unnecessary additives, such as gluttenous amounts of butter, margarine, oil, and the like. So eat, be happy, get healthier, feel better. This book is definitely a plus for those looking for a great approach to healthier eating habits, both with the cardiac disease and without.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted October 5, 2005
The AHA Diet is a Fad Diet
The AHA Diet is a Fad Diet that's been around decades and still diabetes and obseity continues to rise. You are better off with the Doctor's diet which is not a fad, but a working reality created by a cardioligist (SBD). The ADA Fad diet book is CORRECT about the saturated fats and transfats, but incorrect about the high carb starches.
0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted June 24, 2005
American Heart Association does it again.
A common sense program to eating healthy and losing weight. Great job!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted March 25, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 11, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 7, 2009
No text was provided for this review.