Customer Reviews for

Beau Crusoe

Average Rating 3.5
( 15 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 2, 2007

    Too Graphic for this Regency Fan

    Carla Kelly was one of my favorite Signet Regency Romance writers. When Signet canceled that line I was very disappointed. When the announcement came that she was writing for Harlequin Historical I was very excited thinking that she would bring a touch of class that is sadly lacking to the line in their regency department. Unfortunately it was not so. The book went into graphic sex descriptions and cannibalism. It was as if the author has watched too many CSI episodes. She does have good character development and plot line as always as the main characters confronts their ghosts, but the darker tone that was present in some of the Signet romances reigns unfettered in this romance. But if graphic sex and gruesome scenes don't bother you, you will find well developed main characters with an interesting plot. Carla Kelly remains an outstanding writer, I just didn't appreciate the graphic depictions in this book compared to her others and probably won't buy any other book in this line.

    4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 11, 2007


    I've found Carla Kelly to be one of the best of the Regency romance writers, with non-traditional heroes, very good character development, and a willingness to tackle the unpleasant issues of the period. I was very much looking forward to more of her books after the long hiatus, but was very disappointed in this one. Not because of the topic of cannibalism or the sexual scenes, but because it deserved a lot better editing than it got. I found it very choppy, and not at all up to the standards of her previous works (Mrs McVinnie's London Season being one of my favorite books of all time)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 3, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 3 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1