- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Anonymous
Posted January 9, 2004
fun Mayfair sibling romance
While their oldest sister Lady Constance is on her honeymoon, Siblings Prudence and Chastity Duncan continue to publish The Mayfair Lady. They do so to honor their deceased mother, founder of the paper, and to bring in money to cover their father¿s wastrel ways. However, Falstaff, Harley and Greenwold law firm sues the anonymous owners of the Mayfair for defamation of character having slandered their client Earl of Barclay. Needing a barrister to defend them, Pru as the paper¿s business person, dresses to hide her beauty, visits attorney Gideon Malvern. He informs her she deserves the libel suit. Angry at his dismissal, Pru lashes out at Malvern, who sees the beauty and brains hidden behind the spinster garb. As the lawyer and the client fall in love, he tries to get the case tossed out without the court seeing any of the Duncan sisters, who cannot afford the scandal of being the authors of the Mayfair.
Like the first novel (see Con¿s tale, THE BACHELOR¿S LIST) the second Mayfair sibling romance is a fun tale starring delightful assertive females walking a thin line. Malvern is a wonderful protagonist and the trio of females ganging up on aristocratic England is pleasure to follow. As their father becomes aware of the fiscal mess he caused, readers will gain immense pleasure from this charmer (in spite of the back stabbing abhorrent Barclay) and look forward to Chastity closing out the so far terrific trilogy.
Harriet Klausner
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted December 27, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted July 19, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 13, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 21, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 9, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted July 25, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted July 10, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 8, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 4, 2008
No text was provided for this review.