- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Pattyp1031
Posted December 24, 2011
*****
This is one of my favorite newer versions of the Calder family saga.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
It keeps you interested in what will happen next and ends in the only type of ending it could have.
I have read this book many times and never get tired of it.
A GOOD READ -
Anonymous
Posted November 5, 2006
Why is Chase Calder still around.....
Benteen and Lorna had Webb in 1878 / 1879, Webb was 30+ when Benteen died. You give the impressions that Webb and Lillie had Chase in the early 1900s, and he is still around. This books gives the impression that it is up-to-date. And you don't ever write about of Lorna, who helped develop the CCC when you write of the granddaughters, Kathleen and Laura. What gives??? Don't miss understand me, I LOVE the Calder series, but you killed off the former monarchs of the CCC except Chase in the next book. When he was beatup and left for dead he had to be nearly 70, but yet here he is still going in this 9th book of the series. Keep them coming, but Chase should be dead by now. Ever so often I go back and find my Calder series and start over. A dedicated reader.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted November 2, 2006
a good series going downhill
i like the story of logan and cat, but cannot stand how the author is taking the rest of the family. what a completely uninteresting story. i found myself annoyed by what the characters are doing. i know it's fiction but come on. i shouldn't be annoyed by these characters that i'm supposed to be liking and relating to. the end was especially ridiculous. the family treats sloan like crap, then in the end, trey and sloan are back together without talking any thing over. at all. how completely ridiculous. books like this give romance a bad name.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted May 30, 2006
Best Calder entry in several years.
In Montana, Trey Calder, heir to the Calder Cattle Company and its vast Triple C Ranch, meets photographer Sloan Davis at the Miles City Bucking Horse Sale known locally as the ¿Cowboys Mardi Gras¿. The pair is attracted immediately to one another and sees each other even after everyone has left Miles City for their homes. After a short courtship and a warm welcome to the family-less newcomer, they both know they are in love and marry.------------- Paradise collapses shortly after Sloan learns she is pregnant as each soon finds a reason to distrust the other. Trey has found about a secret that Sloan kept from him about her past, a link to Fort Worth¿s Maresco CEO, Max Rutledge, who blames the Calders for the death of his son. Sloan begins to hear that Trey is having an affair, drug trafficking, and the family plans to bury her reputation with dirt including some that is made up if they fail to uncover enough to do a real nasty spin.----------------- Though a bit slow paced, the latest Calder saga tale grips fans of the series due to the heat, passion, and anger between the fifth generation and the outsider orphan. Rutledge provides a powerful realistic threat as he gradually spreads his venom while the support cast, mostly family members and of course the Big Sky Country, add depth to the best entry in several years.----------- Harriet Klausner
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted August 9, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted November 28, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 15, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted July 23, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 5, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 7, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted May 9, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 12, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 4, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted October 4, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 14, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 13, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 23, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 3, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 19, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 16, 2011
No text was provided for this review.