- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Armstrong explains it all
In this book, Armstrong lays out the history of philosophical and religious concepts of God, primarily in the Judeo-Christian tradition and churches.
Her writing is exceptionally clear and straightforward. her essential theme is that God is fundamentally unknowable.
All of the "idolatrous" notions of God over the centuries are very clearly human projections. They are in no way based on revelations of the true nature of the Divine, which human minds just cannot fully understand and describe.
This is a great book for seekers. It is also very good for understanding the views of others. Her material on American fundamentalism is superb.8 out of 8 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
David_A_Bassett
Posted May 28, 2010
More than the title suggests
"We are talking far too much about God these days, and what we say is often facile." That opening line hooked me on Karen Armstrong's new book, The Case for God. As a devout atheist, I was not immediately drawn to the title, but the latest book by this eminent scholar of religion seemed destined for my 'essential reading' list. Within a few minutes it became clear that this was not just one case for God, it was a history of the variety of cases made for god over many centuries and cultures. As presaged by the opening line, Armstrong's focus is on the God beyond "god", the mystic's g*d whose very name cannot even be known, the ultimate of the universe. The book's title could just as easily be, "The Quest For Certainty".
The book opens with a chapter on the twilight before history, Paleolithic cave paintings and their potential meanings. What meaning or use might they have had for the original people who made these images? She explores some potential parallels with our contemporaries who live in Neolithic societies. What meanings do these images offer us for the nature of God, the nature of our understanding of God, or our understanding of our images of God?
From this starting point Armstrong delves directly into the interplay of mythology, meaning, belief and being. She probes the parallels that can be found in mystical foundations of Hinduism, Daoism, Buddhism, Judaism, and other ancient religions of the Middle East, Mediterranean, India, and China. In chapter 2 Armstrong explores the beliefs about God among the ancient Israelites. So far this could be a retelling of her earlier History of God, but in chapter 3 entitled 'Reason' she expands the scope significantly by encompassing the early Greek Philosophers. Often their story is divorced from the religious subject matter and placed with the history of science. Armstrong's treatment brings them closer to the mystics. The call to a life of compassion becomes the common factor across many styles of belief and practice. In the following chapters Armstrong traces the ebb and flow of exegesis between literalism and allegory, between orthodoxy (right words) and orthopraxis (right action), between theology and philosophy.
Armstrong explores the development of a variety of flavors of atheism. Often they are critical of the shallow, facile orthodox religious beliefs that deny the deep mystery of the Universe and may border on idolatry. Secularism is identified as a political movement which has sometimes identified religious practices to be economic disadvantages. Modern Atheism is called "a form of secular fundamentalism" which falsely propagates the absolute incompatibility of religion and science. Modern fundamentalism is drawn out as a reaction to these.
In her Epilogue, Armstrong returns to the question of the purpose of religion. "Religion is a practical discipline, and its insights are not derived from abstract speculation but from spiritual exercises and a dedicated lifestyle." Armstrong places religious practice in closer relation to art, music, creativity, and a life of compassion. "Religion's task. was to help us live creatively, peacefully, and even joyously with realities for which there were no easy explanations and problems that we could not solve: mortality, pain, grief, despair, and outrage at the injustice and cruelty of life."5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted May 8, 2010
Well written, and as unbiased as anyone can be about religion.
It's definitely not an "easy read" (keep a dictionary handy), but Armstrong provides a comprehensive review of how past cultures and philosophers have approached their belief in God and the mysterious. Armstrong does a good job of putting people's faith into the perspective of the times that they lived in, and examining how that has changed over the past several thousand years. She skims over Islam (briefly mentioned as it spread to Western Europe), which was a little disappointing to me, and other than a few mentions of Eastern religions, this is primarily about Greco-Roman philosophy, Christianity and Judaism. I enjoyed the book (I had to return my copy to the library and went out and bought my own), and if you've ever wanted to know more about how Christians and Jews have changed in their justification for faith and how they practice their faith, this is the book to read. As I mention in my header - it's hard to find books about religion that aren't overtly biased from either a preachy-religious perspective or an angry-atheistic perspective. Armstrong's tone through this book was respectful (and almost kind) towards all the people and faiths she analyzed, which I think is missing in a lot of discussions about religion. I will say, if you are a fundamentalist (of any faith), then this probably isn't the book for you since the writing is very frank about how our views of God and the Bible have changed over time and in relation to the external pressures facing people through history.
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted December 27, 2009
The Case for God....?
Karen Armstrong takes the reader on a whirlwind trip through the history of religions. The message is that we have become reliant on finding a definite truth. This attitude came out of the scientific changes of the 1600-mid 1800s when people thought science could arrive at absolutes. To protect themselves many religions turned toward strict sets of beliefs requiring everyone else to be wrong. Although science no longer expects to have absolute truth (hypotheses are expressed in probability and are tentative), many religions have stayed stuck in their "truth" and disparage the truths of other religions.
At the end, the author, asks us to look back to the early days of many religions when people were taught spiritual exercises and experienced rituals that lifted them out of this worldliness and created an emotional connection to something beyond ourselves. These were ways to discover truth, which is more important than believing certain things others insist are the true.
I am not sure she made a "case" for God but she did make a case for recreating these exercise and rituals.2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Karen Armstrong Has Written a Masterpiece on Humankind's Peception of God
Karen Armstrong has done it again. She has written a readable and comprehensive book that informs humans of how our perception of God has changed over time. She has woven philosphy and science into her writing and demonstrated how these disciplines informed and affected how we view good.
The most important message of the book is that it is only in the 19th and 20th centuries that the Bible has been viewed as the unalterable words, not word, of God. This change was occasioned by the growth of science and materialism. Everything had to be empirically proved. So defenders of faith had to find a way to have the Bible meet the standards of science. In contrast, historically, the Bible was seen as metaphors, allegories that helped us understand the world and our need for meaning in our lives. It was not taken literally.
A. Eric Rosen1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
GrannyN
Posted January 18, 2010
Very thought provoking.
This book a rich story of religion (world-wide) and its influence throughout history. It's well researched, thought out, and thought provoking. I highly recommend it.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
nemoFN
Posted December 12, 2009
God With Us
Karen Armstrong has provided an excellent historical overview of the progress of the notion of God throughout human history. It is unencumbered by grand leaps of faith or personal preferences. It is objective. In the end, the importance of a personal God for human advancement seeps through the pages into the reader.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Points out the oddness of our current views, makes strong case
Armstrong has a point to make, and does so without hiding it too much, namely that for the last 5,000 years "God" has filled a role that worked remarkably well for humankind. And that while that role was slightly different in various cultures, the endpoint was similar. Her main point is that in the last 250 years we have slowly but steadily moved away from that viewpoint and in doing so have created the current either/or envronment surrounding God and religion. Very well stated, though she does use some selective facts. Still, her reach is amazing and I personally found the book wonderful.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
AlStead
Posted March 10, 2012
Summary: This book is interesting, but Christians (and God-belie
Summary: This book is interesting, but Christians (and God-believers of other religions) beware: this book reveals how there really isn't anything special, let alone supernatural, about God.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
The author systematically explains how every modern religion traces back to myths originally crafted by primordial man during the days of cave dwellers. The author is not against religion per se. If a person finds benefit in following a religion, and in doing so becomes a better person, especially as it might lead that person to interact better with others, then the author is all for religion. However the author contends that religion should be looked at for what it is: precepts based on myths that have evolved over time to help man cope with the realities of life. The author _is_ against people who are fundamentalists in their religion: people who take their religion as a literal truth, given by an actual God. The author does not single out any one particular religion, though Christianity is the religion most cited.
With regard to Christianity specifically, the author does go into much detail explaining how the Bible was actually authored. The author's explanation adheres to the mainstream, scholarly explanation: that the Old Testament began as separate manuscripts, written by separate groups. These separate manuscripts were later combined to invent a unified history for nomad tribes which were previously independent. This was done as a way of bringing those tribes together under one rule. (i.e. the Bible was crafted as a means to promote a political agenda.) With regard to the New Testament the author explains how different authors wrote stories about the historical figure, Jesus, as a way of conveying their different messages to different people to achieve their agendas.
The author also explains the original intent of the Biblical texts, explaining how the original intent and meaning of the words in their original context has been lost or twisted by fundamentalists. As an example, the word, "believe," in its original context meant only to "devote oneself as a follower". It didn't mean, as it does today, to believe something to be true. Thus in the original context, phrases such as "believe in Jesus" were never meant to suggest Jesus was some supernatural being.
The author concludes by discussing how "God" has finally died out, as evidenced by the sharp reduction in church goers. The author attributes this to people finally realizing religion for what it is and thus keeping it in its proper place. -
JustAnotherVillageIdiot
Posted February 29, 2012
Anyone professing to be religious should read this book!!!!
Karen provides a thorough and thought provoking history of religion and man's unceasing search for God. She treats all faith groups with respect and care and provides critical insights into their origins and their evolution. I wonder if violence in the name of God would cease to occur if every person on this planet would acquire this knowledge and accept its message. This is not light reading, but the concept of God as a subject of study is not light material. While it is clear that Karen's own bias embraces a belief in God's existence, she examines agnosticism and atheism with the same fact-based historical record of their origins and evolutions, and she does so with respect and care. If a person embraces their religion as their personal preferred path to God, I would suggest that they have a moral obligation to acquire the knowledge and enlightenment held in these pages. Hopefully one day we will only wage peace in the name of God!!!!!!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted February 24, 2010
Good Book
There are good ideas about the case of God. It is clear and educational. But its final presentation is not well done. Maybe it is something wrong when the press work was done.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted February 19, 2010
Great book for a better understanding
I am currently a high school student looking for better answers on life and the beyond and this is a great book. It is an understandable reading for most ages with the only problem being the use of ancient greek and latin words and meanings. Great book overall.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Jahangiri
Posted November 21, 2009
The best book to date on the subject of God
This book is a very realistic view of God and where the original idea came from. It also makes a compelling case for the need to explain events in our lives that cannot be understood logically. I would recommend this to anyone who has an open mind and wants to learn more about life.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted October 16, 2009
insightful
Insightful book.
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted February 21, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 23, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted October 4, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 2, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted November 8, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 14, 2009
No text was provided for this review.

