Customer Reviews for

Contributions To Philosophy (From Enowning)

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 5 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 8, 2001

    A book that fills in the blanks...

    The Contributions to Philosophy is an esoteric text in many ways. Heidegger composed this long manuscript in private between 1936 and 1938, and during his lifetime showed it only a few confidants. He specified that it should appear in print only after the publication of all his lecture courses ¿ thus implying that dozens of volumes of introduction are the prerequisite to understanding this book. The Contributions have attracted instant attention, but also created bewilderment, for the most important sections of the text seem to be written in pure Heideggerese. Even more than in his other, already difficult writings, Heidegger exploits the sounds and senses of German in order to create an idiosyncratic symphony of meanings. The translators of this text faced an immense challenge. In addition, the organization of the text is loose. It consists of 281 sections; some are polished short essays, but others are not even written in complete sentences. This is reminiscent of a novelist's notes when building his novel. The sections are grouped thematically, but the book does not follow a systematic plan, as did Being and Time. The style is deliberately fragmentary: this text ¿is no edifice of thoughts anymore, but blocks apparently fallen at random in a quarry where bedrock is broken and the rock-breaking tools remain invisible¿ (§259, p. 436). This is not to say that Heidegger¿s statements here are really chaotic and groundless, but he expects readers to work hard to discover unwritten connections. Heidegger is not just being secretive. He is trying as hard as he can to respond to Being with appropriate language, but he holds that it is simply impossible to say ¿the truth of Being¿ directly. Nothing we can say will make Being unconceal itself with perfect clarity. Being is intrinsically mysterious. We have to learn to give up our ambition to represent things perfectly and directly when we are trying to deal with Being. We cannot turn Being into an object and describe it with scientific precision, because we do not control it; we are already plunged into a way of experiencing the difference between something and nothing. So instead of trying to dominate Being conceptually, we should respond to it with cautious and tentative respect. Heidegger believed that only ¿the few and the rare¿ are capable of thinking this way (§5). Given the esoteric nature of the Contributions, Heidegger would certainly object to any attempt to sum them up in an introductory book, and especially to any suggestion that his thoughts here can be made easy. He even warns us theatrically ¿when philosophy makes itself intelligible, it commits suicide¿ (§259, p. 435).

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 5 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1