Customer Reviews for

A Country Called Home

Average Rating 3.5
( 5 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 5 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 26, 2008

    poignant dark look at idealism without pragmatism

    In Connecticut scholarship medical student Thomas Deracotte met, dated, and married wealthy Helen over the objections of her upper crust parents her father being third generation Yale especially detested this scholarship student. Soon after they exchange I do, the couple in 1960 moves to a farm in Fife, Idaho where he is to open up a medical practice the current local health care comes from a pharmacist. --- Shockingly, Thomas delays starting his practice as he would rather work the land Helen quickly misses her family and her New England upper class lifestyle as farm living is not the place for her. She becomes pregnant while Thomas hires teen Manny to work on the farm. Helen gives birth to Elise, but she soon wants freedom from her intolerant spouse and is lonely from the hours of nothing but motherhood while her husband turns to drugs to alleviate his feelings of failure as a physician, as a farmer, as a husband, and as a father. She considers Manny for a fling and he is falling in love with her. However after a tragedy changes the family dynamics, Manny is more a dad to Elise while her biological father is deeper into drugs. --- This is a dark family drama that looks closely at the 1960s and 1970s when youthful idealism turned to cynicism and disappointment yet with Elise there is guarded hope for the future. None of the four lead characters escape the bleakness, which in some ways becomes overbearing when one traumatic event is followed by another and another until suddenly Elsie is a teenager. Still in spite of the overwhelming sense of negativity, Kim Barnes provides a poignant look at idealism without pragmatism. --- Harriet Klausner

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 10, 2013

    When the two main characters, a newly minted physician and his b

    When the two main characters, a newly minted physician and his bride, leave Connecticut for Idaho in 1960, all seems hopeful. The physician delays opening his practice, however, because her prefers to fish and hang around the hardscrabble ranch he bought. When a baby is stillborn, he becomes distant from his wife. One doesn't expect a young doctor to grudgingly begin his professional work and one doesn't expect a young husband to emotionally remove himself from his newlywed even after losing a child at birth. Shortly before the still birth, this couple was madly in love! The author does not explain or show the reader why her doctor acts in these ways. He experiences even greater tragedy, and this tragedy triggers a response still more morose. The author seems to suggest that his losses explain his behavior, but they do not. Many people who endure great losses get over them and carry on. The doctor's decline lacks dramatic power because it is not explained. This is the main fault of the novel. A number of pages show closely observed writing. The opening, in particular, promises a poetically imagined world. Some of the writing, however, meanders into pointless observations of ketchup splatting out of a bottle and other details that leach authority from the tale. At times, the novel reads like teen lit, as when a character spends time in an institution. The book is set in 1960 and 1976, but the writer fails to evoke these eras or use them as atmosphere for her story. Perhaps the 1960 setting is meant to suggest isolation of the young wife, those being the days before full emancipation of women. It's hard to tell. These shortcomings detract from a full enjoyment of the story. I liked the druggist best. Some of the wry dialogue he is accorded has the wise, laconic ring of a tired old man in a small town. I cared about the characters too, even when their thoughts and actions seemed improbable. A story does not have to make sense. But to be successful, it should convince the reader that it could have happened. The author asks for more faith from her readers to believe that people, young, in love, and in good health, will act self-destructively, than I was able to muster.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 8, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 4, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 5, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 5 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1