Customer Reviews for

Anne of the Thousand Days & Mary Queen of Scots

Average Rating 4
( 19 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(9)

4 Star

(6)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(2)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 1 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    I Also Recommend:

    Disappointed by all the hype, and the twin pairing of these two films

    I must admit that without all the hype over Anne of the Thousand Days, I might have enjoyed it more. I didn't enjoy the lead performances very much, although I have liked other work from them. Overall, the feeling of both films was a bit too romanticized. AotTD also possibly suffered in my eyes because of the excellent Man for all Seasons, another telling of the basic story. However, I felt like Mary Queen of Scots did not suffer from that so much, nor did it seem to have as much of a stagey or stilted feel, although Jarrott directed them both. I would have preferred to have the option of purchasing the latter alone. <BR/><BR/>Owing to the hype, I was expecting a really deep, heartfelt performance from Bujold, who disappointed me by appearing as more of an imp or a moppet than the ill-fated Queen Anne Boleyn. Anne was said to be charming, intelligent, witty, but also strong-willed; however, while Bujold is charming and attractive enough, she appears at times as simply more bratty than witty or strong-willed. Some of her time on screen *is* really excellent, but so many times I felt like the spell was broken. I believe the script may have been to blame more than the actress, forcing her to use insults against Henry like "you booby," or something of that nature. Understanding that while the film used more of a mock-Tudor dialog than actual period speech, so as to be understood easily by modern audiences, the scriptwriter's language choices are now dated as well--and positively jarring! It's as if we see a letter in a presumably serious movie from Thomas Moore to someone speaking of being "pwned." <BR/><BR/>The imagined scene in the Tower between Anne and Henry was unintentionally funny to me as well--Anne does a wild-eyed, head-shaking anger routine on Henry that was far from convincing. Bujold must take the blame for that one. <BR/><BR/>I sometimes enjoy Burton's acting style, but here I did not. It was so hammy I was looking for my eggs and a slice of toast. <BR/><BR/>A few of the lesser characters' performances in Mary, Queen of Scots, were a bit overdone, but Glenda Jackson and Vanessa Redgrave were amazing. I also enjoyed the portrayal of both of Mary's later husbands, Darnley and Bothwell by Timothy Dalton and Nigel Davenport, respectively.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Worthwhile anyway together at this price, they are certainly considered classics: a must for lovers of older films or extreme history buffs. But be warned that those who enjoy modern method acting, or anyone who's already seen too many stagey productions, may wonder what the fuss was all about.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Would not Play

    Neither of these CD's would play! What a disappointment.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 1 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1