Customer Reviews for

Bram Stoker's Dracula

Average Rating 4.5
( 67 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    A reviewer

    It seems that in modern movies, people love to put their own twist on great, classical stories. The victim here, is the great novel by Bram Stoker: Dracula. I decided to watch the movie because I heard it was good and because of all the stars in it boy, I was wrong. I thought it would be even better to watch it at night to make it seem a little more spooky boy, I was wrong. Keanu Reeves isn't bad until he actually meets Dracula Reeves' accent is unbearable and he really couldn't act. I was excited to see Gary Oldman as Dracula, but my heart sank into my bowels when I first caught sight of him. Dracula, according to Coppola, is the long-lost twin brother of Darth Sidious. Dracula also wears an Amadeus wig complete with a three-foot rattail. Instead of being the humble and welcoming man in Stoker's novel, Dracula immediately comes off as creepy and otherworldly. Harker has got to know by now that this guy isn't normal. The women slaves of Dracula don't seduce Harker, but rather just give it to him straight up and he doesn't resist one bit. Soon after Harker's escape from the castle is when I fell asleep: Instead of scaring me, the movie bored me. I'm sorry, but I don't even think that van Helsing was any good, even though he was played by Anthony Hopkins. One scene that sticks out in my mind as ridiculous was when Dracula finally had Lucy in his grasp. Instead of biting her on the neck, like Lugosi or Lee would have, he changes into a werewolf and has his way with her. what the deuce? I thought he was supposed to enslave women, not impregnate them with furry children. I swear, I was waiting for him to howl with pleasure. When Dracula finally turns into a young buck, he looks more like Led Zeppelin drummer, John Bonham than a debonair gentleman. He also wears blue sunglasses that make him look like he went to Woodstock before London. I finally woke up at the end, and of course, Dracula was slain, but Mina seemed to actually be sad. Was there a sick love affair going on between these two? I don't think I want to know. I am euphoric that Mel Brooks made a spoof of Dracula, and it was much more enjoyable.

    0 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Not Great

    Too much special effects looks nothing Like The Dracula I have come to know and love Go see "Frank Langella" or "Christopher Lee" heck even see "Leslie Neilsen" Forget This

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    The book was a classic, the movies leaves something to be desired

    I watched this movie because I greatly enjoyed the original book. To say that I was disapointed with the outcome of this movie would be an understatement. The changes between the movie and the book are marked and obvious. The amount of sexual content was amazing. Content wise this is not all that great of a movie. However, the costumes special effects and so on are incredible. Anthony Hopkins does an exelent Van Helsing and Winona Ryder fits into her character like a second skin. Bottom line: Don't watch this because you liked the book, if you like special effects or lots of sexual junk this is the movie for you

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 16, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1