Customer Reviews for

Brigham Young

Average Rating 4
( 4 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted June 25, 2012

    Excellent film, though at times historical accuracy has taken se

    Excellent film, though at times historical accuracy has taken second to dramatic effect. Thus Joseph Smith's murder is shown as taking place after his trial, whereas in fact it happened before - so obviously he was never convicted of anything. Brigham Young is portrayed as having more doubts than he probably had in reality, but his role in bringing the Saints across the continent is well portrayed. And for such an early (1940) film I thought the Indians were shown in a very fair light.

    BTW, contrary to what anorther review states, Joseph Smith did not violate the First Amendment, which in 1844 applied only to the Federal Government ("Congress shall make no law - -") not to State or local authorities. The Nauvoo city charter gave him extremely broad powers as Mayor, so that, though his action would be illegal today, at that time he was probably within his rights in suppressing the Nauvoo Expositor. At worst, he was guilty only of malicious damage to property, which wasn't a capital offence even in those days. That of course was why his enemies lynched him rather than letting him come to trial. From their viewpoint, a trial wouldn't have produced the "right" result.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 1, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    A Good 1940's Pioneer epic but not historically accurate

    This is a good example of your standard early 1940's western epic; not outstanding from a cinematic point of view, but good nevertheless. The viewpoint is sympathetic to the plight of the Mormons--who remain the most persecuted religious minority in American history. The film does a dissservice to anyone hoping to learn more about 19th century Mormon history, religion and culture.<BR/><BR/>For example though the murder of Mormonisn's founder of Joseph Smith is depicted, there is no explanation as to why he was arrested in the first place. (As mayor of Nauvoo, Illinois he had ordered the distruction of a local newspaper's printing press because the newspaper had published personal accounts of Joseph's then-secret practice of polygamy. As this was a violation of the First Amendment, the Governor of Illinois has Joseph arrested. He never stood trial--as depicted in the film--because was murdered by a lynch mob while being held in jail.)<BR/><BR/>Polygamy--which was practiced by the Mormon secretly during the period depicted in the film (it wasn't made public until 1852)--is mentioned only once directly (by a minor character) and one indirectly when Brigham Young (himself a husband to at least 50 women) praises his wife (the only one portrayed in this film) for never being "jealous of the others."<BR/><BR/>What's most disappointing from an historical point of view is the characterization of Brigham Young himself. The real Brigham was a VERY forceful character who tolerated no dissenting opinions from his followers. This film presents Brigham as someone who was rather quiet and introspective, who was forceful only when attacked. Think of it as the "Sunday school version" of a religious leader.<BR/><BR/>Charlton Heston's protrayal was a little more on the money (historically speaking) in the awful 1995 TNT film, "Avenging Angel"

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Historical Film Well Done For Once

    I thoroughly enjoyed watching this movie. Plenty of drama, action, and actually historically correct "if not politically correct by todays standards". While the movie doesn't focus on the "controversial" aspects of Young or the Mormons, one should keep in mind that this was pretty much standard practice before all the pc bs came into vogue.... thankfully so! Watching this movie one will appreciate the trials and tribulations of the Latter-day Saints, the only religious group to ever suffer official persecution in the United States.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Good Story, But Missing Essential Information

    This saga of the Mormon Church is well done considering it was made 63 years ago. Dean Jagger, Vincent Price, Tyrone Power, and Linda Darnell, all did superb work. However, the story line is told more from the idealistic Mormon's view with no mention of why Mormons were persecuted and what had really lead to Joseph Smith's demise. Even though Brigham Young was the most infamous American polygamist in history, no mention of it is made in the movie. And it's great that the seagulls came and ate the crickets, but they do that every year in the Salt Lake Valley, so it wasn't just a miraculous Godsend. Not bad though, for such an old flick.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 4 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1