Customer Reviews for

House of Cards Trilogy

Average Rating 5
( 6 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 5 review with 5 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    ...And be a villain

    Let me get the mandatory Richard III reference out of the way early. Like the Shakespearean king, House of Cards' Sir Francis Urquhart is a charming, ruthless murderer who will stop at nothing to achieve power, frequently speaks directly to the audience, and gets all the best lines. Unlike Richard, Urquhart is a relatively complex figure, motivated not solely by ambition, but rather a fierce belief in his arch-conservative views, and that he is by far the most qualified man for the job. His murders and lies are all for the benefit of Great Britain, which without him would become a miserable, second-class welfare state dominated by the Continent. It is a testament to Richardson's performance is so charismatic and his dialogue so sharp and acidic, that you can almost start to believe him. House of Cards is definitely Richardson's show, he is in 95% of the scenes, and the remaining 5% consists of other people talking about him, but the trilogy contains many other great performances, with Susannah Harker's Mattie Storin in Part 1 and Michael Kitchen's King in Part 2 being clear stand-outs. Harker turns an INCREDIBLY difficult role, and one that in lesser hands could have completely ham-strung the series, into a tour-de-force. Her Mattie, a journalist corrupted and destroyed by her own submissiveness, becomes the haunting, discordant strings just audible under Urquhart's martial timpani. Michael Kitchen has another near impossible job, playing a king who is not quite Prince Charles, but clearly meant to evoke him. The new king is compassionate, decent, and popular, and therefore a genuine threat to Urquhart's administration. However, unlike most of the PM's enemies, he is someone who cannot be intimidated, co-opted, or failing that, quietly killed. If the second series, To Play the King, is the best of the trilogy, it is because in it, Urquhart has a worthy adversary, and Kitchen's tight-rope performance is the major factor in that. All in all, House of Cards is simply a great show, suspenseful, funny, smart, and centered by a main performance that ranks as one of the best in the history of television.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 1, 2010

    I Also Recommend:

    The Rise And Fall Of Francis Urquhart

    At long last I have finally gotten the chance to sit down and watch the trilogy of miniseries's known simply as the House Of Cards trilogy. Based on the novel trilogy by UK author Michael Dobbs the three miniseries's (House Of Cards, To Play The King and The Final Cut) detail the rise and fall of Francis Urquhart, a politician of the UK's Conservative Party played by the late, great Ian Richardson. To help you the reader decide if you'd like to purchase this DVD box-set here are reviews of all three parts of the trilogy.

    House Of Cards:

    House Of Cards is a fine example of what the political thriller can be. From the performance of Ian Richardson as Urquhart, the performances of the supporting cast, good production values and a fantastic script as well. It is a complex story with a complex protagonist that takes a look at power and its ability to corrupt and how far one will go to achieve it and is a fine one at that.

    To Play The King:

    To Play The King is a fine successor to House Of Cards. From the performances of Richardson and Michael Kitchen in the lead roles, a fine supporting cast, good production values and a well written script as well. While it is not the thriller the original was and is somewhat less gripping as a result, To Play The King works as something else instead. It is a parable about what happens when the liberally minded and the conservatively minded face each other head on. The result is thought provoking indeed.

    The Final Cut:

    The Final Cut proves to be the last, if unsatisfactory, part of the House Of Cards trilogy. While there's fine performances from Richardson and Diane Fletcher plus much of the supporting cast the issues with other members of the supporting cast, some low budget feels, direction and script issues weigh this part down significantly. The result is a good but overall unsatisfactory conclusion which seems rather a shame.

    Overall then, it's a fine set of miniseries's. There's three fine performances from Ian Richardson which alone make this set of stories the success that they are. Though the final part of the trilogy is rather unsatisfactory the first two parts are highly successful and highly entertaining. It's also a remarkable look at the rise and fall of one ambitious man and his government. If you are a fan of either political thrillers, British television or both look no further then the House Of Cards trilogy.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted October 1, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Ruthless, Delightfully Evil

    "House of Cards" is about a ruthless politician who is a master of manipulation. Devoid of conscience and morals, Francis Urquhart destroys everyone in his path as he meets his political goals. Wickedly entertaining.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    First class

    I was addicted, watched all 3 in 4 days. Richardson just incredible.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 17, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 5 review with 5 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1