Customer Reviews for

Hugo

Average Rating 4.5
( 17 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(12)

4 Star

(2)

3 Star

(3)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 17 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted March 28, 2012

    more from this reviewer

    HUGO should have won the Oscar for Best Picture. AMAZING!

    The film seriously touched both of us. I'd expected a beautiful looking movie; I'd seen the trailers and oohed and aahed over Robert Richardson's stellar cinematography. What I hadn't expected was to be so moved by it; and on so many levels.

    What really got me was how Brian Selznick's book The Invention of Hugo Cabret and Martin Scorsese's passion for both early cinema and film preservation, melded into such an homage to the magic of the movies. How they are the stuff dreams are made of. How they transport us. How they help us define our purpose. When the film curator says of George Melies "he changed my life", you know that's Martin Scoresese saying it too. Watching some of the old and recreated old footage, I couldn't help but feel it.
    The actual story of the two orphaned children doing all they can to evade the station inspector, Sacha Baron Cohen who is at once hilarious, monstrous, pathetic and all too human, Hugo's determination to fix the automaton to discover a message from his dead father, his evolving relationship with Isabelle's Papa George, that's the story the children will appreciate. I would think the appropriate age is anywhere from about eight and up as it is a bit long. But the George Melies' tribute, sitting in an audience watching a medium use new technology to lovingly look at its cinematic roots, that is the stuff any film buff will be enchanted with.
    As to the 3D, while I mostly love the depth and richness it provides, wrapping you up completely in the environment, there are still those occasional blurs in the very close foreground that take me out of the story. A tad disconcerting but otherwise the film was filled with so many sweet moments, I was utterly swept away.

    So you haven't read this book, neither have I. Maybe your kid did, or maybe not - it's a Caldecutt medal winner by the way. It doesn't matter. If you love movies - and you must or you wouldn't be reading this - please go see Hugo. Asa Butterfeild, Chloe Moretz, Ben Kingsley, Sacha Baron Cohen, Sir Christopher Lee and Martin Scorsese will make your heart swell and your eyes fill. That's okay. Theatres are dark. No one can see you.

    I've been posting pretty prolifically about HUGO. You may want to check out Five things I learned about Martin Scoresese, Howard Shore scores for Scorese again ,Robert Richardson shines a light on Hugo about the cinematographer, or Hugo: It isn't just for children which features a video discussion between 3D auteurs James Cameron and Martin Scorsese as well as Mike Fleming's 25 reasons why you should see Hugo.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 3, 2012

    more from this reviewer

    A MAGICAL MOVIE

    HUGO the movie, is a good adaptation of the novel. Scorcese had a flair for details and with excellent production design,it makes the movie cinematically magical. The Paris metro train station is full of life with people and stores. The movement of people is likened to the parts movement of the clocks in the station. An orphan boys who has an aptitude for repairing things mechanical, including a steel man from the museum, makes the movie plot a cohesive whole that is unique and entertaining. An old man who owns a toy store in the Paris metro station was once a silent movie maker in years gone by, with his wife, and he owns the steel mechanical man that can make a drawing of the sun with a telescope who happens to be used in the credits in one of his silent movies. This drawing was the item of bewilderment to Hugo who wants to know what it means. There maybe some omissions or additions in the movie as compared to the original book story, but as a whole the movie is entertaining and a must see. It's a movie for all ages definitely!!!

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 27, 2012

    more from this reviewer

    Best New Movie of the Year In my opinion

    I loved this movie. I took my 6 yr old nephew who lives in France to see this over Thanksgiving while he was visiting Atlanta. I enjoyed it so much that I then took my husband to see the 3D version. I'm buying a copy for my 3 yr old Granddaughter, and one for myself. The story is exciting, sad, sweet, and told from the perspective of an orphan boy who is determined to repair his father's automaton. He lives in a Paris Train station where he maintains all the clocks. He befriends a young girl and discovers a whole new life that is enhanced by her grandfather who keeps his past a secret. Anyone with a love of the movies, especially very old movies, will thoroughly enjoy this enchanting story.

    1 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 27, 2013

    Great movie for all ages

    This is very well done with great acting and Paris landscapes. Martin Sorcese is one of the best directors working today. The young man that played Hugo did a fabulous job!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 3, 2012

    The themes that Martin Scorsese addresses in this film—the

    The themes that Martin Scorsese addresses in this film—the thin line between self-recrimination and nostalgia, the effects of advancing technology on thriving art forms, and the lasting effects of a father’s love—would seem misguided in a typical children’s film. “Hugo,” however, a children’s film directed by Scorsese—one of the greatest American film directors of all time (“Taxi Driver,” “Goodfellas,” “The Aviator,” “Raging Bull,” “The Departed”)—is no typical children’s film. Scorsese has made a children’s film for adults who still experience the joys, wonders, mysteries, and painful epiphanies of childhood.

    First of all, the “exotic” setting of a 1930s Parisian train station establishes the wistful tone. The film is beautiful to behold—the colors, the cinematography, the set design, and the art direction are all stunningly beautiful. The plot itself focuses on the titular hero, a young boy who lives in the rafters and bowels of the station and spends his time adjusting the station’s numerous clocks, evading the menacing pursuit of the Station Inspector (played by an appropriately surly Sacha Baron Cohen), and searching for parts that animate the automaton left to him by his dead father (played by Jude Law in an unfortunately brief appearance). Through the course of his quest, Hugo encounters an elderly shopkeeper (Ben Kingsley in another masterful performance), the shopkeeper’s god-daughter, and a film historian. Through these connections, Hugo begins to piece together not only the mystery of the automaton but also the impact of the beginnings of cinema as an art form.

    The film is sumptuous, the plot is charming, the actors are magnificent—yet somehow the film amounts to far less than the sum of its parts. I found myself bored at many points during the film—the story seems to linger a bit too much, allowing the viewer to appreciate (almost excessively so) the aesthetic and nostalgic beauty of the film. Overall, I’m glad I’ve seen it, but “Hugo” is not a film that I plan on ever watching again.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted January 29, 2012

    You HAVE to see this movie!

    This movie is the best book to movie film ever. The film is so much like the movie, as far as I noticed, they only got rid of one character, the man with the eyepatch. Even with this character gone, the plot stayed very simmilar to the book. They also added things to this movie to make it more entertaining, a love scenario between the station guard and the flower shop lady. This movie is a movie that kids, adults, and people of all ages will love.

    0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 27, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 29, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 5, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 18, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 19, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 29, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 13, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 25, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 4, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 19, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 7, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 17 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1