Gift Guide
Customer Reviews for

Superman II

Average Rating 4
( 7 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 4 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    2006 version in comparison to 1981 version

    The Richard Donner cut version of Superman II is a stronger film than the 1981 version. This film features Superman’s father in many scenes, as opposed to his mother that was shown in the 81 version, which makes more sense considering the fact that he is the one who sent Superman to Earth, as well as the one who imprisoned the three villains. This film shows the scene in which Jor-El, Superman’s father, sentences the villains to the shadow zone, and Zod’s vow to have Jor-El and his heirs bow to him. In this movie, the villains were released by the nuclear missile that was launched at the end of the first movie. This is a better plot twist than the hydrogen bomb that is set off within the elevator in the 81 version. This film also goes into detail about what happens when Superman gets his powers back. In this scene, and the scene in which Superman gives up his powers, Jorrel scolds Superman for his decisions, which is a bit more realistic than how his mother reacts in the 1981 version. There are certain scenes that are worse than their replacements in the 81 version, such as the scene in which the villains come to the Fortress of Solitude. In the 81 version, there is a conflict between Superman and the villains, almost like a fight. In the 06 version, the villains simply find Superman and threaten him using Lois. Also, Superman turns back time at the end of this movie in order to cause Lois to forget his identity, leaving several plot holes and the lack of satisfaction due to the fact that none of the events in the movie actually happened. In the 81 version, Superman kisses Lois to make her forget, and he has still saved the world. Overall, this version of the film is stronger than the version released in 1981.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    The Donner Version Takes the Gold

    Superman II, the 2006 version, was superior to the 1981 version in many ways. Although Superman is supposed to be a comic adventure, and therefore is a break from reality, the Donner film was more realistic than the Lester film because the characters were smarter in Donner’s film. Lois Lane, a Nobel Prize nominee for newspaper writing, should have been able to figure out who Superman was earlier. In the Lester film, she figures out that he might be Superman because Clark disappears before Superman saves a little boy at Niagra Falls. This is further evidenced by Clark tripping over a pink bear rug and falling into a fire but not being burned. This all happens pretty far into the Lester film, making Lois seem very stupid for her character. In the Donner version, Lois draws, with a black marker, a suit, hat, and glasses on a picture of superman. She realizes that he looks exactly like Clark. She looks for further evidence by shooting him with a blank. He reveals himself to her before she tells him that it was only a blank and that it never would have hurt Clark Kent if he wasn’t Superman. This trap makes Lois fit her character of being smart and a good investigator her trickery led to a confession. Several of the unnecessary scenes, which were in the Lester film to allow for him to have produced 51% of the movie himself, were cut out all together or were cut down considerably. The wind blowing scene, where the villains blow away the mob of angry New Yorkers was cut to the bare necessities. Much of the physical humor from that scene was cut out so that it would be the suspenseful scene that Donner wanted it to be. The entire scene in the hotel room was cut because it had no bearing on the storyline. It was a regular hotel room, so there was no purpose to crack any of the jokes that were made when Clark and Lois first saw the hotel room that they were to share. Remember that mystery from the Lester Superman II about how Clark got his powers back? That’s another thing that the Donner version improved on. The green crystal led to his father giving him one final “address”. Jor-El gives Kal-El all of his power so that Superman can carry out his duties on Earth. He speaks to his son one final time, then his hologram comes towards him and gives him the powers. Let me just say that the 2006 version had much better special effects thanks to new editing techniques. The effects with Gene Hackman’s character, Jor-El, brought the scene to life and showed that the father was a hologram/ghost but was still there with Kal-El. In a final analysis, there’s no contest. Although each film recycled some scenes from the other, Superman II (the Donner Version) is far superior to Superman II (the Lester version).

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Superman 2

    The two films of Superman 2 were both created in the early 80s but only one was put out in theaters. The one that was put out in theaters in 1981 was a little weaker then the one that was put together in 2006. This film was created in 1981 but was put together and released in 2006. The director of the 2006 film was Richard Donner. The way that Louis finds out that Clark is Superman is much better then in the 1981 version. In the beginning of the film she draws a hand, glasses and a suit jacket on a picture of Superman and it looked like Clark. Then later in the movie she shoots a blank at him and he confesses that he is indeed Superman. In this film it shows how Superman is able to get he powers back. When he goes back to his home, Krypton, he finds the Green Crystal and sticks it into the last of the standing column of the control center. His father is shown for a brief while and Superman is able to get his powers back. This scene is much betters then the scene in the 1980s version because it shows he was able to get his powers back. The beginning of this movie starts off where Superman 1 when the missiles were going through the air and he brings them into space. This is a better way to start off the movie because it picks up where the other one left off. When Clark and Louis go to Niagara Falls the room is much different. The room that they went to in the 1980s version had a big pink bear rug, heart shaped things everywhere and a vibrating bed. In the 2006 version the room was much more normal and would have been what some one would have stayed in when they went to Niagara Falls. The ending of this movie is a little weaker though. The “Super Kiss” was a better way to end the other then having him rewind what happened. This may have left a starting point to the next movie because the missiles would still be going through the air and it would happen all over again. These few scenes that Donner had in his film made the film a much more exciting and better film. This film started off right where the first Superman ended and if the point to make two films right after each other was to have them be one big movie. The 1980s version did not work like this. It was more of two separate movies with the same themes. The tone in the 2006 film was a more serious film but had funny parts in where they were needed. This made the film better becaus

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Superman II: The Real Deal

    In 1981, something happened on the set of Superman II. With most of the production finished, a new director was brought on to wrap up the film. Richard Lester was credited with releasing the 1981 version of SII and Richard Donner, the original director, was credited with nothing. In early 2006, he was given the opportunity by the SII production team at Warner Brothers to re-release the movie, as he would have released it way back in 1983. And what a stunning difference there is in the quality of the film. No longer would the world have to sit in semi-feigned amusement at the 1981 release of Superman. Richard Donner’s vision is brilliant. Superman is again a resolute character and is once again given his seriousness back. He knows that he is dealing with the three greatest super villains to ever exist on his now dead planet Krypton and that bothers him. He also realizes that everything he has never known from his planet Krypton is also gone and that bothers him even more. He is a bothered character and his internal disturbances make him highly believable. Superman no longer is caught in moments of awkward innuendo with Lois Lane and succeeds in being strangely dark. When he abandons the city of New York because he cannot defeat the super villains without the help of the Fortress of Solitude, it actually feels like he knows that he is absolutely and hopelessly screwed. He doesn’t just fly away because that’s what the script says he should do like in the 1981 version of the same scene. There is no unbelievable nuclear bomb threat at the Eiffel Tower in Paris that ultimately ends up freeing the super villains from the phantom zone. Instead, there is a nuclear missile launch and the missile’s explosion frees the villains. There is no horrendously un-serious honeymoon suite at Niagra Falls no pink bear skin rug and no vibrating bed. It all fits. Superman is a real character. SII by Richard Donner is definitely worth the viewing, especially in conjunction with the earlier SII 1981 release of the movie. For those that know Superman and realize that he is a truly disturbed individual with a lot on his mind, this is the perfect movie. He is not a comical representation of the man in blue and he is obviously deeply motivated to do good by the dark driving forces contained within the gray matter of his mind.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 4 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1