- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Page 1 of 1
-
Great Show!
Lena Heady may be no Linda Hamilton, but her interpretation of iconic character Sarah Connor is paramount to how good this series is. Great casting weaves an excellent story in which borrow from both the excellent S.M. Sterling T2 books and the underwhelming T3 movie (while saying that bascially the events in those two sources never happens) liberally, yet feels fresh all it's own. Well casted, the story moves along at the perfect pace as Connor, her son John (a very good Thomas Dekker) and a sent-from the future terminator named Cameron (Summer Glau) as they evade not only evil terminator agents but the legal authorities. It's a shame this show only lasted two seasons, as this show's writing and acting are good enough to surpass some of it's source material.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Kentucky_reader
Posted October 1, 2010
Great series! Fans of the movies should like this.
The writing in this series is top-rate. Casting is superb. If you like the Terminator movies and haven't yet seen TSCC, you owe it to yourself to check it out.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
A great movie that became a good series
Terminator the Sarah Connor Chronicles is a good serie for fan of the first two Terminator movies.The serie when it first start off it start out like any other Terminator movie there are Terminator send to kill Johon Connor and then there is one send back to pertect him but instead of a guy this time it is a girl Terminator play by Summer Glau.Summer Glau is no Arnold but she play her part well and to top it off she give out werd sence in the show in witch you dont know if you can trust her or not.This season only has nine episodes but there good episode leading up to the last episode of the season witch end with a bang and a shoot out that all i can say with out give any thing away.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted October 17, 2008
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 2, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 14, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted October 22, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted March 25, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 17, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted November 11, 2008
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 4, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
Page 1 of 1