Customer Reviews for

War of the Worlds

Average Rating 3.5
( 40 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(15)

4 Star

(12)

3 Star

(4)

2 Star

(3)

1 Star

(6)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    They drink us and spray us?

    I've loved the 1953 movie version of War of the Worlds since I first saw it, and I have the DVD as well. I've also heard and enjoyed Orson Welles' 1938 radio broadcast. But when the Spielberg version was released, I really had no interest in seeing it. Two reasons: (1) I didn't think it could top the 1953 version (as it turns out, it doesn't), and (2) Tom Cruise. However, when someone whose tastes run similar to mine recently told me it was pretty good, I bought the DVD. Well, some of it *was* pretty good. And some of it was pretty bad. My first viewing left me with mixed feelings, likely due to my high expectations. So I watched it again, and enjoyed it more the second time. As has been noted in other reviews, the special effects are rather spectacular. But to me, some of them had a superimposed look, although I'm pretty sure all the effects were CGI. From a technical standpoint, my favorite scene is the one on the freeway early in the film. Ray (Cruise) and company have appropriated the only functional vehicle and are weaving at high speed through miles of dead cars. The camerawork in this scene is nothing short of amazing. Unfortunately, I can't say the same about the screenplay. Some of the dialog is actually laughable. For instance, during that same freeway scene, Ray's son Robbie (Justin Chatwin) asks if terrorists are responsible for the melee. Then Ray says: "This came from someplace else." Robbie: "What do you mean? Like Europe?" Later, in Ogilvy's (Tim Robbins) basement, Ogilvy -- referring to the aliens -- tells Ray: "They drink us then they spray us." Ohhhh noooo. Contrary to what many have said, I don't think Dakota Fanning screams too much at all. If that stuff were happening to me, I'd be screaming, too. Gene Barry and Ann Robinson (the stars of the 1953 version) were given cameo roles in this version. I think that's a nice touch. For the sake of avoiding spoilers, I won't go into the plot's gaping holes and rampant illogic. Let's just say that the movie requires suspension of disbelief in a big way. This isn't the best movie I've ever seen, nor is it the worst. Despite its flaws, I do think it's worth seeing, particularly if you like Tom Cruise and lots of eye candy. It's even better if you can get it at a bargain price. Just be sure to check your expectations and logic at the door, and try not to think too much as you watch it.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Awesome effects, but bad story

    Although I loathe Tom Cruise and what he has to say about Psychiatry, I have to admit he did a good job as a dead beat dad. I loved Spielberg's direction, especially in the cellar scene with Tim Robbins, but all the effects and great directing can't save what is basically a flawed script. The way the invasion occurred just makes no sense. The original movie had more plausability to it, but the writers seemed to have jettisoned this in favor of something less believable.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    Not bad, but not great

    Although this movie was nowhere near as bad as the ridiculous and laughable "Independence Day", it was not great. It had its high points, such as the scene in Tim Robbins' basement where they are trying to avoid the probes, but overall, it left me thinking that there should have been more. All this build-up and all the buildings and overpasses being destroyed, and it ends as quickly as it does with very little plausibility. Like most Spielberg films, it is long on visual and short on mental.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 8, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1