Customer Reviews for

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

Average Rating 5
( 3 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 1, 2010

    The Story Behind the Film:

    "No one under the age of 18 will be admitted unless accompanied by a parent or guardian." That adage would become the obligatory accompaniment of any film receiving an R rating, when the policy of rating motion pictures was established in the late '60s. The first film to carry this commentary was 1966's "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?", which in its time marked not only the significant screen translation of an important play (the best drama of the decade, according to some) but also the latest of those important movie milestones which help redefine the notion of the Hollywood product. Here were two of the current superstars, Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton, fresh from their success in the ultimate, and one of the last of the old-fashioned Hollywood super spectacles, "Cleopatra" but here they were now speaking language that had never been heard in an American commercial movie before, as they forsook the glamor of their previous pictures. "Virginia Woolf" created a strong public outcry for more stringent censorship of films, simultaneously excited and upset various portions of the moviegoing public, and forever left behind the notion that American films could not deal with adult material. In point of fact, Edward Albee had managed to shock even the legitimate theater when his play was first produced in 1962. In the early '60s, Albee's symbolic shorter plays - including "The Sand Box", "The Zoo Story" and "The American Dream" - had been presented off-Broadway, where these searing studies of the sickness in American society had been perfect in keeping with the avant garde attitudes of the audiences. Then, Albee's first ful-length play was presented in the legitimate Broadway Theater. Though his characters were no longer allegorical figures, but believable people caught up in a domestic situation of infidelity, self deception, and an inability to discriminate reality, "Virginia Woolf" still contained the acerbic implications and outlandish language of Albee's earlier works. By bringing them to Broadway, even in the guise of a domestic melodrama, Albee proved himself to be a creative force in the new, evolving generation of important playwrights. "Virginia Woolf" altered both the mentality and the conventions of legitimate drama and when, only four years later, the play was transferred to the screen, almost everyone assumed it would have to be hopelessly watered down since movies were at the very least ten years behind Broadway in terms of maturity. But Jack L. Warner, the old fashioned studio head who personally stood behind the project, insisted it be done without the expected hedging. So producer/screenwriter Ernest Lehman was given the go ahead to keep almost all the film's language intact, making only minimal changes in locale (the single room setting was opened up slightly to include the entire house) and retaining practically all of the play's salty language. Anyone who feared the super sexy couple of the decade would glamorize the frustrated college professor, George, and his blowsy wife, Martha, quickly discovered Burton and Taylor were actors as well as movie stars. Burton successfully squelched his strong screen magnetism, making himself look every bit the meek, mousey fellow, while Taylor ranted and raved with enough conviction that she came off as a miserable college town matron rather than a longtime Hollywood celebrity. In order to assure the project would be handled properly, Warner decided to hand the directorial chores to a young man who had never before done a motion picture - but was clearly in tune with the current styles of the 60s. Mike Nichols had worked as a popular satirist with Elaine May, and then achieved notoriety with his handsome direction of several Broadway plays by Neil Simon. Sensing the material in "Virginia Woolf" marked so drastic a departure from the usual screen fare that his stoc

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 30, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 7, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1