Customer Reviews for

Eye of the Storm (sequel to "Resurrection")

Average Rating 4
( 350 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(145)

4 Star

(124)

3 Star

(48)

2 Star

(17)

1 Star

(16)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

Most Helpful Favorable Review

7 out of 8 people found this review helpful.

Kidnaps You From Your Day!

This is a sequel that continues an awesome paranormal thriller, Resurrection. If you like action, this book will not disapoint you at all. Don't start to read this before bedding down for the night - it is a page turner you can't put down. Or at least I couldn't! I like...
This is a sequel that continues an awesome paranormal thriller, Resurrection. If you like action, this book will not disapoint you at all. Don't start to read this before bedding down for the night - it is a page turner you can't put down. Or at least I couldn't! I like it when the leading character's family is more than a conversation or two but become part of the heart of a story. And this leading man ends up putting all of them in grusome places. Great read for thriller genre lovers.

posted by Munningss_SCapingReality on August 15, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review

Most Helpful Critical Review

2 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Ever hear of logic?

I wrote a previous review for Resurrection, again problems with logic - when people are lost you call in a search party decent read until the logic falls apart. The author choses excitement over a glaring loss of logic in both books and ruins both for me.

posted by 2read4me on August 19, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 17 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted July 15, 2011

    So disappointed

    Although I enjoyed the first book (Resurrection) very much, this one was such a let down. The police man brother that becomes the main character in this story is whiny and irritating to read about. There are interesting aspects of the story but they are never really explored in depth. It is sad because this story had so much potential.

    1 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 2, 2012

    Interesting Book but..............

    I have no idea how ? the manuscripts get into the electronic ?mode, but this book was very poorly ? Having a hard time ? reading ? review? Well, question marks are scattered throughout the book where they shouldn't be. The ends of sentences are left out. If you're willing to put up with all of that, then I receommend you read it because the story is interesting. I gave it a low rating due to the problems interferring with reading it. The story deserves a 3 star rating.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 14, 2011

    more from this reviewer

    Not what I expected...

    In this sequel, it left me going "WHAT"??? I felt that this book went alittle wonkie, and left me confused at times... Not by the wording but how hit kinda jumped here and there.. Expecially in the first few pages. Though I have to omitt that the ending is now what I had expected. Ms. Reinke could of expanded on the niece alittle more in this book and would have helped this book along better.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 13, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 5, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 7, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 19, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 29, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 1, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 26, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 10, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 14, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 27, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 25, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 31, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 15, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 6, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 17 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1