- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Posted January 31, 2000
Unable to comprehend
I am unable to understand what the fuss is about this book. Nor can I understand for what reason it won the Whitbread Prize in 1994. Set in in the present tense it is daring but slow and mired in detail of surroundings.Trevor is master of those things that are banal and that we perform subconsciously everyday like the dipping of a biscuit into tea. In the slowness of the book tension is built and it's true that Felicia's Journey does read very close to the lines of a thriller.But it falls outside that in it's close apposition to the minds of the two main characters and other characters.This is the question that I beg to ask: does fine literature have to look to serial killers and those psychopaths that we would not rather talk about to find it's theme ? I was under the impression that this was the domain of thrillers and bestsellers. Not to put too fine a word on it , do I dare say that Felicia's Journey is common? Obviously not. That is not to say that, however , that I do not appreciate the difference that William Trevor adds to this theme.The only thing is if I had known I would have won the Whitbread Prize I would have written it earlier or wasn't it wriiten earlier when Thomas Harris wrote Red Dragon, Silence of the Lambs ... and Hannibal?
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.