Customer Reviews for

Godel's Theorem: An Incomplete Guide to Its Use and Abuse

Average Rating 2
( 2 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted December 24, 2008

    It's okay

    I bought the book after reading a review in the MAA Monthly, which I found to be incredibly fascinating. Unfortunately, the book did not continue where the review left off as I had hoped.<BR/><BR/>The writing is *very* technical and hard to understand. I can see that the author tried to make large passages as easy-to-read as possible, but the effect is that large passages are incomprehensible to the trained mathematics student (the most important definitions appear much later on if you are looking for them, as I was), and not so useful for the "general reader" (without the definitions, it is hard to fully understand the metaphors).<BR/><BR/>The back of the book says that the book was written for a "general audience", but I would say that it is meant more for the advanced undergraduate to beginning-intermediate graduate.<BR/><BR/>As one other point, the book is hard to read because of the writing *and* typesetting; it appears that an article-style LaTeX file was simply published, when the LaTeX file should have been rendered in book-style (so as to have a wider inner margin and a thinner outer margin).<BR/><BR/>Hopefully the author will make a second addition that has better organization (made more like a math textbook), because the concept of creating a guide to the Incompleteness Theorems is a good one, I think, and this text has potential.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted December 18, 2012

    An Incomplete Guide

    I recognized Torkel Franzen's name from his participation on many Usenet groups over the years and associated his name with informative discussion. With the jacket blurbs to this book I was looking forward to something really helpful. I'm not sure the book quite delivers. I came to the subject with some background and some questions. The book helps to raise additional questions, but it is so informal that the questions are never quite argued or answered. I would not want to defend the questions (or such answers as are attempted) in full-on academic or peer-reviewed forums. Even the writing is informal as most Usenet posts, and a little short of what one expects in book form. If you are desparate for some unconventional perspectives on Godel's Theorem you will find some leads here, but what to do with them, starting with fully understanding and validating them, is left as a very significant exercise for the reader.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1