- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Posted March 1, 2013
I was very impressed with the theory presented in the book. Some
I was very impressed with the theory presented in the book. Some of the drawings seemed simplistic and it was definitely not written in the scientific vernacular that can sometimes make a similar work tedious to read. Over all the theory this writer puts forth is definitely worth considering. The book does not delve into the application of his theories into enough detail in regards to sociological and economic implications but rather assumes that his theory makes the implications obvious. I give him a five on the theory presented and consider it a refreshing if not unique perspective.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted February 15, 2013
I thought it might be fun to read the theory of a layman; after
I thought it might be fun to read the theory of a layman; after all, most scientists seem to get stuck in the same old rut and spew the same old theories. This book began interestingly enough and I was pleasantly surprised.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Unfortunately, this author lost all credibility in my eyes with his frequent references to information he found in Wikipedia. Even Wikipedia's founders admit that their articles aren't all accurate, and I find it difficult to stomach a scientific theory book based on what can be found in highly such a highly questionable arena.
I only made it through about 75 pages of this book before I decided to leave well enough alone. When reading a book like this, I prefer to be able to weigh an author's theories against the more well-known and "credible" theories out there. In my estimation, creating a theory based on flawed and poorly researched ideas is sophomoric. I may still keep this book for some light reading when I find myself wanting to contemplate someone else's ideas, but don't feel the need to be bogged down in "fact"...
Posted February 21, 2013
No text was provided for this review.