Customer Reviews for

Havemercy

Average Rating 3.5
( 16 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(5)

4 Star

(4)

3 Star

(4)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted March 31, 2013

    It started a bit slow but had a strong finish. It took me a lit

    It started a bit slow but had a strong finish.

    It took me a little while to get sucked into this book, but once I did, I really enjoyed it. The approach of using four different first person points of view was a bit unsettling at first, but the voices of the characters were quite distinctive and they all had interesting character arcs. The story takes place in Volstov, a fictitious empire that bears some resemblance to czarist Russia and seems to have roughly mid to late 19th century level of social organization, but with magically assisted technologies. Volstov has been at war with its neighbor, the KeHan empire, which has a sort of Mongolian, or possibly even Japanese feel to it, for the past 100 years. Volstov has gained the upper hand in the war through the use of its dragon corps. The "dragons" are magically animated mechanicals, but they are intelligent and form a strong bond with their pilots. Nonetheless, the dragons' magical fuel does not allow them to reach the KeHan capitol, which is why the war has been dragging on for so long.

    The four point of view characters Royston, Hal, Rook and Thom are all very different. There are two storylines, one involving Royston and Hal, and one involving Rook and Thom, and they don't really converge until about midway through the novel. I don't want to disclose too much of the plot, but I will say that of the four characters, I took the longest to warm up to Rook (the dragon corps pilot who flies the dragon Havemercy), as he is a bit of a stereotyped arrogant macho "Top Gun" kind of character. He does become more and more interesting, as the nuances of his relationship with Havemercy and with Thom emerge.

    The two biggest complaints I had were that it took a while for me to get a sense of where the novel was going and how the story lines would converge. It never bored me, however, and the characters were intriguing, even if it took me a while to figure out what each of them wanted to accomplish. I'd say that Hal was probably the weakest of the four. I liked him, but he was the one where I never really felt much of a transformation/change.

    The other complaint was the near complete lack of interesting female characters or perspectives (unless you count Havemercy, who was referred to as "she" in spite of being a machine). In fact, the only women who made any kind of appearance in the first 1/2 or so of the novel were the diplomat's wife (whom Rook had smacked on the butt and called a whore) and Royston's extremely vapid and unsympathetic sister in law. At first I kind of assumed that the authors were trying to present a 19th century level of social organization where women were often simply invisible and pretty much despised by men (and since the pov characters were all male, we were seeing the insignificance of women through their eyes). But later in the book, it came out that women could be university students and magicians too. Perhaps there will be some more interesting women in some of their future books. I hope so.

    I will say that the authors created an interesting world. There were a few small questions I had, like why oh why were books called "Romans." That strikes me a bit of the old "calling a rabbit a 'smeel' thing you see sometimes in fantasy. Not sure what books have to do with Rome, and since this was a fantasy world, there wouldn't necessarily even be a Rome in their history anyway. I also wondered why the dragons were intelligent, since they were essentially machines that had been animated/fueled by magic. But if they were intelligent (because their creators imbued them with a bit of their own souls), why they needed pilots. But it was a cool enough premise, I was able to suspend disbelief there for the most part. I would have liked a little more description of the dragons (what they looked like).

    But overall, the book was a lot of fun and I want to read more by these authors.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 31, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 5, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 21, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 4 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1