Customer Reviews for


Average Rating 3.5
( 6 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 1, 2013


    We all know that W. Irving got all of the credit and accolades for writing about Sleepy Hollow's Headless Horseman and Ichabod Crane. But, according to the author of "Headless," he, in fact, wrote it and Irving stole it from him. And, to add salt to the wound, Irving purportedly, changed the ending from a "dark foreboding grisly warning" to an "everything works out as it should and all are well" conclusion. The ending is the pinnacle of his argument and the most interesting part of the story.

    The author tries to use specific examples in order to compare and contrast his "original" work and Irving's published book. to prove his case to the reader. This becomes old quickly. Instead of a calculated attack on Irving, the author mumbles, stumbles, and wanders around tangential topics long enough for me to lose my interest in anything that he has to say.

    Even though it dragged in places, and the monologues ran a bit long, I am glad to have finished it because the end was so very good.

    The best part of the book was the comparison of the "printed ending" vs. the "alternate/original ending". The added content regarding "what really happened" to Mr. Crane and Brom Bones was well written and completely unexpected.

    If nothing else this is a good re-write to the timeless classic. It deserves to be read. The alternate endings were so good that I forgave the slow slogging parts.

    I would re-read it again. And I suggest that others do the same. I recommend it to older readers due to extreme violence, bad language, and hazardous pranks throughout the course of the story.


    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 3, 2013


    Ok story

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 3 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1