- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Posted December 6, 2012
Posted April 26, 2012
This is not a true copy of the original 1611 King James Bible. K
This is not a true copy of the original 1611 King James Bible. King James I was Catholic and so the original 1611 King James Bible also included the Apocrypha. I would not recommend this to anyone who wishes to read the Bible in it's first English version since a large portion of it is missing. I was told it was a marketing tool. But that is not a good reason to leave out parts of the original which would lead those who buy this copy to believe that is they way it read. Other than the missing books and additions to other books it does give the reader a feel of how hard it was to read this version. The type is terrible but that was the type of the time.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted May 12, 2011
not recommended at all !!!
This Bible is not a true edition of the original 1611. They left out books that are very important to know. Please get the 1611 Edition although it costs more, the one by Nelson is a true copy of the original edition as translated.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Posted March 22, 2011