Customer Reviews for

Irish Game: True Story of Crime and Art

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 11, 2004

    Engaging Tales but not History

    Matthew Hart has brought to life some of the characters and events in the world of art theft, but the bits and pieces do not add up to a coherent story. Of even greater concern is the apparent failure to have knowledgeable proof-readers check the manuscript. In his title, Hart sets the goal of revealing the incredible history of thirty years of art theft in Ireland, and the interplay of law enforcement, the tony society of art museums and collectors, the violent underworld of Irish gangs (criminal and terrorist) and their ties to the Boston Irish mob. But the tale is only partially told, omitting the Cahill/Gilligan/Foley succession in the Dublin gang and their continuing involvement in art theft, and the rise of the Irish Travellers as the greatest threat to privately held art and antiques throughout the British Isles. Instead, Hart jumps to The Scream theft and sting in Norway - interesting, but not part of 'the Irish game'. The errors in fact are numerous, which leads one to believe that few if any of the law enforcement agents he writes about were given the opportunity to make corrections. On the first page (xi) he makes the assertion that the Buccleuch Madonna with the Yarnwinder 'can be attributed with confidence to the hand of Leonardo'. Published accounts reveal that that is not the case. In discussing the background of Charley Hill, Hart confuse Hill's unfinished degree in history at Trinity College, Connecticut with his year as a Fullbright scholar at Trinity College, Dublin (p.61). There is also confusion about the dates of St. Patrick's Day and the theft at the Gardner Museum (p.108). The former is always March 17 and the latter was the morning of March 18, 1990. And when Whitey Bulger went on the run (p.120) he had been indicted only for racketeering. The murder and other charges came years later, after his former lieutenants told authorities where the bodies were buried. (On the very night that Whitey's younger brother, Billy, in his capacity as the president of the University of Masachusetts, was welcoming Gore, Bush and a national TV audience to the first of the 2000 presidential debates, several of Whitey's victims were being dug up by law enforcement agents a short distance away.) The details of the Beit (1993) and The Scream (1994) stings do not ring true. They conflict with other published and broadcast reports, and Hart has relied on sources who were not in a position to know what really happened. Why is the chapter on the Beit recovery titled 'Liam's Story'? Liam Hogan was only marginally involved in the planning of the operation and was hundreds of miles from the action and danger. Why is Einar-Tore Ulving made a central figure and source in The Scream sting? He was arrested for involvement in the theft, and, while he was later released, a number of the policemen on the case do not believe that he just doing his civic duty. Charley Hill and 'Syd Walker' were at the heart of both stings - these should be their stories. The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum paintings have not been recovered and the 'true story of crime and art' has not been told.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1