Customer Reviews for

Journals: 1952-2000

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted April 20, 2009

    I Also Recommend:

    Interesting if a little dull

    My biggest problem with the book is the editing. Schlesinger's sons wanted to have the book finished for his birthday, but he died before the book was completed. In their rush, they didn't do a very good job of editing. I am too young (38) to remember first hand many of the people and events he talks about, and I only remember the big names and events from past history lessons. It would have been helpful to have a cast of characters, similar to a play, at the beginning of the book to help identify the many personalities who were a part of Schlesinger's life. Also, in-text identitifications of people were inconsistent. As for Schlesinger himself, I disagree with the earlier two reviewers. I don't think Schlesinger "hero-worshiped" the Kennedys. I think he identified with them and their family strongly, but he also states when he disagreed with JFK's policies or discusses what he thought were his failings. I also don't see him as a Nixon-hater. Did he detest the man? Sure. But when he discusses his distaste for Nixon, it is more regarding his politics and how he implemented his policies than his personality. When Nixon lived next door to Schlesinger, he really didn't have much to say about him, and certainly didn't rant about his hatred of the man. What I found most interesting about this book is how politics haven't changed at all from the 50s. Republicans use the same tactics against Democrats they always have (not patriotic, want to turn America into a socialist/communist country, etc.) and Democrats even then had the tendency to wimp out. What is interesting is that the Democrats were known as the war party, not the Republicans. That is certainly a switch from now. I like Schlesinger. He is intelligent and reasonable in his views. He handles disagreements with his opinions calmly and seems to have a knack of making his old enemies his new friends (William Buckley). Throughout most of the book he is cheerful, full of purpose, and humorous. I find his frequent complaints about his inability to finish his FDR book (and I hope he managed to finish it) due to the letter-writing, speech-giving, etc. engagements funny and familiar. I've thought many times I could get more stuff done if people would quit bothering me! An earlier reviewer mentioned his constant complaints about lack of money, yet he is always going out to eat (and not at McDonald's either) and jetting off to Europe. I think that is odd too. Although I encountered the same situation when reading Joan Didion's Year of Magical Thinking (an amazing book--and Joan Didion was one of those people Schlesinger detested), and discussed with a friend who also thought it was odd. We decided that certain people--people who reside within the privileged circles of society--don't care as much about paying their bills and will always go out to dinner at a nice restaurant or go to Europe and never worry about paying those pesky bills. I don't know where Joan Didion and her husband and Schlesinger and his wife found the money to do all the things they did, but I figure some of it was the trips were paid for because they were business-related trips (many of Schlesinger's were) or some of their rich friends paid the way. Anyway, Schlesinger's Journal is good reading for the historical stuff (esp. once he got into the 90s--events and people I remember and who are still in the news)and I really wish I knew what he thought of the 2008 campaign and John McCain, Sarah Palin and Barack Obama.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 6, 2007

    Hero worship run amok

    An enjoyable read - but - the worship of the Kennedys was almost embarrassing to read. He complains about being broke all the time and yet dines out, vacations and parties with the movers and shakers, all the time. The hatred of Nixon, in particular, but others as well, shows a mean, petty little mind. He was human, but flawed. And to think he was writing national policy positions to be mouthed by our so-called leaders. Scary!!!

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 8, 2007


    Great read, however I am uncomfortable with the elitist tone. Why have so many brilliant and lovely people described, got it (policies) so wrong over so many years.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1