- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Anonymous
Posted April 1, 2000
I liked it very much
I enjoyed reading 'Likely to Die' very much. I could not put it down. It kept me in suspense thru out the who book.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted January 8, 2012
Good,but....
Good read, as always, though not my favorite of the series. This one needed a much heavier hand in editing, plus I believe that scenes were omitted in the nook edition. Witing improves dramatically in later books of the series. I'll keep reading them!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Notek
Posted August 12, 2011
must read
All of Linda Fairstein's books are excellent and this is no exception.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Likely to Die
This is the second book that I read of this author and I think I like her. The book held my attention and was a good read. I'm not sure I'd recommend it to young readers due to the sexual content and explicit descriptions of the characters love-making.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted November 5, 2001
Great Reading
This was a very suspenseful book with great characters. Many twists and turns kept it interesting and it was difficult to solve who killed Gemma.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted June 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted May 9, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 13, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted March 8, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 6, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 1, 2008
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted March 25, 2012
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 19, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 12, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted June 15, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 2, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 14, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 31, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 19, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 30, 2010
No text was provided for this review.