Customer Reviews for

Marcus Aurelius: A Life

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 9 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted September 10, 2009

    Surpassing reading

    This is a book that demands to be owned rather than borrowed. It will take pride of place on your bookshelf and fill it with specific gravitas. The author has exhaustively researched the life of Marcus Aurelius who is fairly judged by history to be the best of all Roman emporers. But more than that, the author, Dr McLinn, knows the intellectual and spiritual currents of the times and throws additional light on the development of Christianity in the Roman Empire. As an historian of ideas, he gives the best introduction to Stoicism I know and how the philosophy ruled the life of Marcus Aurelius. What was particularly revealing to me was the low level of intellectual life of the Roman underclasses. But the upper classes did not by any means redeem themselves, either, by their lack of curiosity and death grip on materialism. One revelation found in the book is the dismal realization that Rome fought her foreign wars not only to maintain her wealth, but to replace her manpower through slavery. Dr. McLinn deserves to win all of the related book prizes offered to reward his honest labors. But his thoroughgoing effort will probably be exempted by something closer to the dictates of political correctness and closer to our self-defeating interests. This book is a treasure and a source book that reads as easily as an interesting work of fiction. I recommend it highly to anyone who wants to learn about history in real time and the reader will find himself enriched beyond the mere sociological treatments on contemporary events. Guderian

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 5, 2010

    Author frequently expresses his personal distaste for Stoicism

    If you became were introduced to Marcus Aurelius via Stoicism, prepare to get spat upon by this author that expresses (Often) his distaste for one of Marcus's most well known charecteristics.

    Over, this is a quality biography. Look to others for details. This is my main concern...

    This author has issues with both Stoicism and the Cynics. Throughout the entire book, there are multiple usages of the words 'inuman' 'absurd' 'fallacious' (And more) when the author is speaking of Stoicism with regards to Marcus. At times the author comes across as if he were trying to talk down to Marcus in real life.

    And the few times that Cynicism is mentioned, he again trashes it as well. The author referes to the lifestyle of Diogense of Sinope as a 'guise'. He says, quote '...Diogenes was the son of a forger and counterfeiter...' -

    I'll leave it at that, because if you've studied even an ounce of Diogens background, you'd know that he was not a son of a counterfeiter. Right there, the author loses credibility for saying something that is false.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 12, 2009

    A Decent, Available Biography Behind One of Rome's Last Best Emperors

    In general I thought the book was alright, and I would have probably given it four stars and not three had it not been that the author took too much liberty denouncing or refuting some of the principles of stoicism that Marcus Aurelius may or may not have believed. Generally speaking, I'm not interested on what any biographer personally thinks about some certain person and/or subject simply because it should be up to me to form my own opinion on about the person and/or subject. On certain, brief instances it's alright to interject, but I thought it was neither certain or brief in this book. Authors should simply stick to the person and/or story and the telling of it. Other than that, it was interesting to learn more about this roman emperor.

    PS: I apologize for any grammatical errors in this review.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 11, 2009


    A thorough and reasonably-well written review of the history of the life and times of Marcus Aurelius, mixed in with philosophy soup. The author cautions us about the internal contradictions of ancient Stoicism as if he were a high-school teacher afraid that the false prophet will find followers among the student body. There are also irrelevant comparisons to other personal-confession philosophical works. But the content of Aurelius' thought itself is slighted.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 11, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    I Also Recommend:

    A Great Read

    Frank McLynn has not only done his research, but also he has organized a biography of a person from ancient history in a very helpful way. On the one hand there is the telling of the life of Marcus Aurelius. On the other hand there is the telling of the times in which he lived. Influence of the French historian Fernand Braudel here as one learns what people thought, their basic beliefs and how they differed from our modern ones, the economy and how people from all walks of life made a living and what their standard of living was, the impact of disease on the general population and much higher mortality rates especially amongst children, and much more all woven into the biography of Marcus Aurelius. Then too there is a great deal of philosophy, partly what Marcus Aurelius believed and practiced, and then comparing Marcus Aurelius to philosophers from all different ages. Fair warning though: better have a dictionary handy, as McLynn's vocabulary is way above the average reader, at least it seems to this humble reader.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 9, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 3, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 30, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 10, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 9 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1