Customer Reviews for

Medicine's 10 Greatest Discoveries

Average Rating 5
( 1 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 28, 1999

    History of Medicine made easy..

    When I ordered this book, I was intrigued by the title, but expected no more than another history book. Instead I found much more. This very readable book tells us how pivotal discoveries in Medicine came about. Not through logic, reason and application of the Scientific Method. But by chance observation, serendipity and a willingness to consider something new. Vesalius awoke the medical community to the science of Anatomy after 14 centuries of fervent adherence to the preachings of Galen. This fanatical Paduan anatomist turned to human dissection to find out the facts in this age of enlightenment. He gifted his encyclopedic knowledge to Charles V in his biobligraphic marvel 'De humani corpus fabrica' in 1543, 700 pages of typographic and illustrative excellence, a publication so scientific that it can be considered to have initiated medical science itself. William Harvey's description of the circulation of the blood relied heavily on the works of Galen, Servatus (burned at the stake for his contribution to anatomy), and Colombo - and yet no credit was given to them. The English were eager to nominate their first Medical hero, Harvey, in his description of the nature of the heart and circulation. The careful planning of Royal Society allegiances, and his cautious 'adjustments' to Galenic theories allowed him to state, in 'De motu cordis' the words 'I began to think whether there might be a motion, as it were, in a circle..' Simply by measuring the amount of blood in a dog's left ventricle, and multiplying it by the heartrate, he concluded all of the blood volume would be expelled in a minute - hence the need for re-circulation. The authors continue to tempt your curiosity with other pioneering discoveries. The 'little creatures' brought to light by the eccentric Dutch haberdasher, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, and his microscope, ushered in the science of bacteriology. How would the chemist, Pasteur, have succeeded in helping French vintners without an appreciation of the world of yeasts and moulds without such an advance? When the idea that a microbe would ever be found to explain puerperal sepsis, Pasteur drew a small chain of beadlike structure on the blackboard, saying 'I'll show you a microbe..' Pasteur's success with anthrax and rabies, and Koch's with tuberculosis, are seminal works, despite their proponents rivalry and isolationism. Both of these scientific giants changed the course of history with a simple draper's invention. We learn, in these chapters, not only of discovery, but of the circumstance of great men. For example, Edward Jenner was acknowledged as an orthithologist, an inducted into the Royal College for his work on the migration of birds. Not for his work on vaccination against smallpox, a scourge that killed 20-40% of those afflicted, and scarred many more. It was his ability to interpret animal findings, and apply them to the human population, that gave him the courage to innoculate cowpox into James Phipps left arm, conferring subsequent immunity to smallpox. We learn that anaesthesia had several inventors. Crawford Long, in 1842, commented that bruising after one of his 'laughing gas parties' had been relatively painless, as was the dental extraction he attempted on a willing anaesthetised subject. There were several contenders as to who was 'first' in this field. Co-invention may have occurred, but scourilous characters made false claims that muddied the waters of science. What would have happened if Wilhelm Roentgen hadn't noticed the fluorescence of a scrap of metal by his Coomb's tube, and attributed it to a new type of radiation? And if he hadn't invited his wife to his downstairs lab, and exposed her hand to the first x-rays, who would have thought these bones could have been visualised? Ross Harrison was not someone I knew much about, but his work on tissue-culture allowed us to study cell function, promote the development of modern vaccines, and aid

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1