Customer Reviews for

Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America

Average Rating 3.5
( 267 )
If you've bought this product, tell the world how you liked it. Write a Review

Rating Distribution

5 Star

(90)

4 Star

(75)

3 Star

(47)

2 Star

(24)

1 Star

(31)

Most Helpful Favorable Review

4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

Wonderful book. I'd give it six stars if I could

I loved Ehrenreich's original Harper¿s piece that turned into Nickled and Dimed, but the book is even better. In the face of all the glib talk about how easy it is get by on minimal wage jobs whose pay has stagnated for 20 years, Ehrenreich tries to actually do that--to...Read More
I loved Ehrenreich's original Harper¿s piece that turned into Nickled and Dimed, but the book is even better. In the face of all the glib talk about how easy it is get by on minimal wage jobs whose pay has stagnated for 20 years, Ehrenreich tries to actually do that--to live on the $4.80 or $5.50 an hour jobs that are the sole livelihoods of millions of Americans. She creates a wonderful portrait of a world that to most professional class Americans is absolutely invisible. Ehrenreich tells wonderful stories about all the ways that low-wage jobs grind people down, and about how the people caught in those jobs respond with human dignity and solidarity. in the middle of all the forces that grind people down. She's talking about real and urgent issues, but the book is also terrifically funny, both in documenting the blythe callousness that affluant Americans express toward those who serve them, and in her handling of her own role. The humor helps make this a terrific read, and it makes her core points all the more powerful. I also thought constantly while I was reading this book about the Republican overturning of the ergonomic standards. The jobs she describes routinely destroy people's bodies, because of their pace and because of the conditions people work under. Yet we've now ditched the very standards that would have begun to prevent this. With union contracts, people have some protection against the most destructive situations, without them, like in the jobs she describes, they¿re totally thrown to the wolves. In my dreams, every political and corporate leader would read Nickled and Dimed and heed its lessons, but since that's probably not going to happen, the rest of us better read it and start demanding we actually become a nation of 'liberty and justice for all.' Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen: Living With Conviction in a Cynical TimeShow Less

posted by Anonymous on May 16, 2001

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review

Most Helpful Critical Review

10 out of 18 people found this review helpful.

Prejudiced, Racist, Class-based writer

Please do not waste your time reading this. This is the worst book I have ever read. She is a racist and makes class based remarks that are not warranted. If she or the publisher had proofread the book and taken these unnecessary remarks out, the book might have had ...Read More
Please do not waste your time reading this. This is the worst book I have ever read. She is a racist and makes class based remarks that are not warranted. If she or the publisher had proofread the book and taken these unnecessary remarks out, the book might have had value. The way it is written now, is horrible and should be pulled off the shelves. I only started noting quotes about half way through although they litter the entire book.

"...not to mention my worry that the Latinos might be hogging all the crap jobs and substandard housing for themselves, as they so often do." p. 121

"Irene had problems, yes. She was both black and Indian, a migrant farmworker, and had been raped by someone and also abused by her boyfriend, who left an ugly scar on her face." p. 133

"I slide $255 in cash under the glass window that seperates me from the yound East Indian owner-East Indians seem to have a lock on the midwestern motel business-and am taken by his wife to a room..." p.151

"The town of Clearview presents only two low-priced options to its kitchnless residents-A Chinese all-you-can-eat buffet Kentucky Fried Chicken-each with its own entertainment possibilities. If I eat out at the buffet I can watch the large Mexican families or the even larger, in total body mass terms, families of Minnesota Anglos." p. 159

"One night I come back bone-tired from my last break and am distressed to find a new person, An Asian American or possibly Hispanic woman who can't be more than four and a half feet tall,..." p. 167

Really? Were any of these distinguishing remarks actually needed to tell the story? NO, not at all. She just writes naturally that way because she doesn't like anyone but the white race.

Please DO NOT buy this book!Show Less

posted by 6566354 on January 11, 2011

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Page 1 of 14
Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 267 Customer Reviews
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 11, 2011

    Prejudiced, Racist, Class-based writer

    Please do not waste your time reading this. This is the worst book I have ever read. She is a racist and makes class based remarks that are not warranted. If she or the publisher had proofread the book and taken these unnecessary remarks out, the book might have had value. The way it is written now, is horrible and should be pulled off the shelves. I only started noting quotes about half way through although they litter the entire book.

    "...not to mention my worry that the Latinos might be hogging all the crap jobs and substandard housing for themselves, as they so often do." p. 121

    "Irene had problems, yes. She was both black and Indian, a migrant farmworker, and had been raped by someone and also abused by her boyfriend, who left an ugly scar on her face." p. 133

    "I slide $255 in cash under the glass window that seperates me from the yound East Indian owner-East Indians seem to have a lock on the midwestern motel business-and am taken by his wife to a room..." p.151

    "The town of Clearview presents only two low-priced options to its kitchnless residents-A Chinese all-you-can-eat buffet Kentucky Fried Chicken-each with its own entertainment possibilities. If I eat out at the buffet I can watch the large Mexican families or the even larger, in total body mass terms, families of Minnesota Anglos." p. 159

    "One night I come back bone-tired from my last break and am distressed to find a new person, An Asian American or possibly Hispanic woman who can't be more than four and a half feet tall,..." p. 167

    Really? Were any of these distinguishing remarks actually needed to tell the story? NO, not at all. She just writes naturally that way because she doesn't like anyone but the white race.

    Please DO NOT buy this book!

    10 out of 18 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 7, 2003

    offensive

    This book was horrible. I can't believe that I gave this person money! The author doesn't bother to really understand what she is writing about. She is consistently surprised that the poor folks around her aren't impressed with her PhD.... and what's sick is that she doesn't get that a PhD shouldn't impress the working poor. Why does she feel that she is so much better than everyone else... why doesn't she bother to find out how the people around her are actually making it work? How in Gods green can she have problems getting by for ONE month when she has a paid for rental car, $1000 going into the experiment and an income, however meager? Why does she feel that eating off you lap is a major plight of the working poor that she has to write about it? Has she never been to a picnic? The idea was fabulous... it's too bad she ruined it. Lastly, no real suggestions to solve the problem? Raise minimum wage? Doesn't she realize that the cost for product will rise too... and still a worker at Wal-Mart won't be able to afford to shop there? All I got from this book was that a spoiled child couldn't figure out how to live on less. Bummer for her. Fortunately most people on the planet are a little more crafty and intelligent. Finally, we as Americans only need to look to other countries to understand what poor really is.

    9 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 27, 2010

    ridiculous

    I had to read this book in an college English class. This woman has no idea of the stresses of the everyday joe. She acted as if what she was doing isn't done EVERY SINGLE DAY by people all over this country. What really upset me was the fact she spoke of all the wonderful things she had waiting on her at home, if she wasn't able to find and/or keep a job. How many people can say that? Not to mention all the money she is making off writing about being poor! UGH!!!

    8 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 10, 2008

    I have never been so sorry to have read a book.

    I do not even wish to waste my energy telling people how belittling this book is to the working classes of America. However, my desire to let as many people know as possible is strong. I am even more shocked to learn that this book is actually recommended reading in some schools. This author has nothing to offer in the way of insight.

    6 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 16, 2008

    A thought provoking read indeed

    It would be impossible to comment (honestly) on the text without discussing my opinion of the author as it revolves around her... I mean really now. Who sees any sort of humor at all in this book? I actually find the author's tone to be completely indignant and arrogant, she is ungracious, unkind, even cruel in her tone towards her 'friends' and co-workers while she is playing poor. She even goes so far as to compare her plight to that of a princess being punished by being forced to hand feed all her subjects... this lady is a real piece of work. She is absolutely deplorable and such a snobbish, egotistical (well a not so very nice person)! Her 'insights' and her surprising realizations scare me, I mean if real people actually find shock and awe at the same everyday DUH she makes a big fuss over, then this country is way past salvageable!!! She is a career essayist who lowers herself to play poor for a little while, and tries to maintain a decent quality of life while getting by on minimum wage, something which is definitely not her area of expertise. She describes looking for places to live, jobs, working conditions and overall environments of the places she goes. She alienated, humiliated, and demeaned almost everyone she met, though not in any sort of dialog to their face, just her thoughts about them... This is definitely a must read, but not for the reasons by which I kept being mislead. For people like myself, this is at times hard to read, however it is definitely a book you will not soon forget, and definitely an author you will not soon forget either.

    6 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 14, 2002

    Save your hard-earned money

    While the author's experiment is certainly intriguing and even worthwhile, objectivity is quickly clouded by Ehrenreich's opinions on various social issues. During the brief time she works as a maid, she's pretentious enough to criticize the people who own the homes she is cleaning. She implies that these owners, many of whom she has never met, must be mean, selfish people because they actually own something of monetary value and are paying to have it cleaned. The possibility that they may have earned money through hard work to buy their possessions never seems to occur to her. Of course, this might have broken her moment of self-righteousness. Likewise, on page 100, she describes how self-conscious and ostracized she feels about wearing her garish maid's uniform in a supermarket, saying that she's 'getting a tiny glimpse of what it would be like to be black.' In today's society, that is hardly an accurate comparison. If anything, maybe she got a glimpse of how a disfigured or physically handicapped person may feel, but I doubt such people go about their daily routines with the indignant paranoia she displayed. Granted, there are injustices everywhere in America. However, it still remains the best country in the world for individuals to achieve their goals and attain economic comfort. It is up to the idividual to take the initiative for improvement; no one else can do it for them.

    6 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 3, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Excellent Read for the Right Audience

    Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting by in America by Barbra Ehrenreich was and excellent book. I greatly enjoyed the story and information that it held. Throughout the book I learned new and eye opening things. With many non-fiction books the information can be overwhelming. Through Ehrenreich's writing I was able to enjoy the story and gain the knowledge. This book had the perfect balance of story and facts pertaining to what was going on in the story. Her writing style was also liked by the many recommendations I received for this book. I first herd of this book through a reading list. I found the overview interesting so I deiced to ask around whether it was good. I was astounded by the many people who insisted I read it. They would comment on how it was great and very eye opening. With such enthusiasm, how could I resist? I strongly feel that this is a great book and a must read but it is really for the right audience. I have a strong passion for the equality of all and this book gets down to that, equality. Many people are kept down impart by these minimum wage jobs and unable to enjoy the true "American Dream". From housing to just putting food on the table this book showed the struggles a minimum wage worker face. When reading you gain quite allot of knowledge on the struggles they face. I feel you need, to sum degree, an interest in learning about that. Although this is really eye opening and a must read, this book is written for a high level reader. Often, as a ninth grader, I felt lost or unsure of what happened due to the reading level. I must impress that do not let the reading level stop you from reading this book. I would often slow down and reread many of the passages to gain a better understanding. It is a great book and the reward of knowledge gained is greater than the struggle to understand it fully. This book had quite an effect on me. I consider myself a conscientious person but I never knew how hard it is to survive on a minimum wage. When I see the low wage jobs she endured in my own life I hold new appreciation for the work they do. For me, this book truly made me look at m life and to appreciate the comfort I live in. Although I go on about how it made me think this book did not force any concepts or ideas at me. It never gave the feeling that because you in part support these jobs you are a bad person. Ehrenreich of corse wrote her opinions the book more presented the facts, leaving the verdict up to the reader. I highly recommend this to anyone, regardless if it interests you, It is one of those books that was just good and should be read. I encourage you to read Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting by in America.

    4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 16, 2001

    Wonderful book. I'd give it six stars if I could

    I loved Ehrenreich's original Harper¿s piece that turned into Nickled and Dimed, but the book is even better. In the face of all the glib talk about how easy it is get by on minimal wage jobs whose pay has stagnated for 20 years, Ehrenreich tries to actually do that--to live on the $4.80 or $5.50 an hour jobs that are the sole livelihoods of millions of Americans. She creates a wonderful portrait of a world that to most professional class Americans is absolutely invisible. Ehrenreich tells wonderful stories about all the ways that low-wage jobs grind people down, and about how the people caught in those jobs respond with human dignity and solidarity. in the middle of all the forces that grind people down. She's talking about real and urgent issues, but the book is also terrifically funny, both in documenting the blythe callousness that affluant Americans express toward those who serve them, and in her handling of her own role. The humor helps make this a terrific read, and it makes her core points all the more powerful. I also thought constantly while I was reading this book about the Republican overturning of the ergonomic standards. The jobs she describes routinely destroy people's bodies, because of their pace and because of the conditions people work under. Yet we've now ditched the very standards that would have begun to prevent this. With union contracts, people have some protection against the most destructive situations, without them, like in the jobs she describes, they¿re totally thrown to the wolves. In my dreams, every political and corporate leader would read Nickled and Dimed and heed its lessons, but since that's probably not going to happen, the rest of us better read it and start demanding we actually become a nation of 'liberty and justice for all.' Paul Loeb, author of Soul of a Citizen: Living With Conviction in a Cynical Time

    4 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 8, 2011

    Relevant Now More Than Ever

    Please read this book! It is not meant to be an indictment of the working class, racist or any other "-ism". This book illuminates how, in the land of the American Dream, it is possible for the poorest among us to also be the hardest working. It highlights how entrenched aspects of our society and culture make it nearly impossible for hardworking, well-intentioned people to change their financial and socio-economic situation. I'm sure most negative reactions are from those who wrongly assume that the author's criticisms are aimed at the people in the stories rather than seeing it as aimed at those organizations who "pimp" the workers and institutions of this country. Now, as we decide what we will do individually and collectively as a society, we need to understand how the system works for the working poor. Reading this book will help in that understanding.

    3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 23, 2011

    Especially true for the current recession.

    While this book has probably rang true for everyone around the world for thousands of years, it brings in how we need to do something about it with only a clear idea of how everyday people are being treated. This book was very well researched. I will definitely be using this book in my classroom.

    2 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted November 29, 2010

    A good read...if there is absolutely nothing to do.

    Barbara Ehrenreich proved to have excellent style, great diction, and determination- I will not deny her talent. In the beginning of her book, Nickel and Dimed, she maintained her purpose and tried to pursue it; however, throughout her book, her purpose changed, her expertise proved to be faulty, and the quality of the book wavered from time to time.
    In the beginning of her book, I grasped what her purpose was, but reading deeper into the book changed my perspective. I no longer knew if she was still trying to prove her point about how people living in the United States could not get by in America solely based on minimum wage, or if she was trying to show us how corporate companies treated its workers or just to show us her concern for the poor.
    Ehrenreich's expertise fell at a fast rate since the first time she introduced herself. She described herself as an intelligent person, with a PhD, and a middle class lifestyle; however, nearing the middle of the book, Barbara quits her jobs due to stress and frustration. If some needy person quit his/her job, what would they acquire to buy his/her necessities? She did not stick with the jobs long enough to prove her points/purpose. How can we trust her findings if she did not remain long enough to know if she could survive on minimum wage for her own self? Towards the ending of the book, Barbara shows her concern for drug tests. She is concerned to pee in a cup! Why should she be concerned? She, through implication, tells us that she smoked marijuana. Her incident with the weed serves as a blow to her credibility and reliability. She also shows signs of racism, and is stereotyped, and is biased- three characteristics most readers do not approve of.
    In the evaluation and afterword, she praises herself for her "job well done", "determination", and survival. She talks about the audiences' praise towards her and she stops talking about her supposed purpose in the book. Her new topic is her concern for the poor and her concern to form unions at workplaces and schools.
    Overall, her book was a good read, it just lacked a thorough purpose and consideration towards her audience.

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 9, 2010

    Check out library

    this book was very interesting to me because I didn't know how low wage workers actually go through. This opens my eyes out a lot and makes me wonder that there are certain people out there that need money and are trying to find a way to survive and support themselves. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to lear what low wage people go through.

    2 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 29, 2002

    Time NOT well spent

    This book will be read primarily by unambitious people who feel sorry for themselves and would be better off reading a book on some technical or managerial subject. The author points out a couple of examples of people who may have had the opportunity to advance, but did not do it. The book is ended with (almost) the same statement as the Communist Manifesto: 'Workers of the world unite!' The author is only attempting to instill her political agenda through this 'research.' I gave it two stars because the subject matter itself was interesting, not because the book is any good. Do yourself a favor and read something that you will learn something from. Don't bother feeling guilty from your own achievements.

    2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 30, 2002

    Not Exactly True To Reality

    I was required to read this book for college. As I will be attending an all-womens college, this book focused mostly on WOMEN not getting by in America. I had disagreed with Ehrenreich many times in the book, particularly when she mentioned that working hard may bring the low-wage workers deeper into poverty (pg 220). Hadn't these workers received a proper education just like upper middle class workers? Maybe the low-wage workers should've 'worked hard' in school. Unlike low-wage workers, I challenge myself with education. Although I pity the conditions of low-wage wokers, I can't say that I feel guilty for helping those conditions--which, like millions of Americans, I had not known I had done until I read this book--because I don't feel guilty for how hard I work in school or for what I have achieved. I also wasn't satisfied with the novel b/c the author didn't enter her personal life. As a low-wage worker, did she meet any friends along the way? Or do low-wage workers stay away from friends? What about family? Did she keep in touch with her family when she was a low-wage worker? Ehrenreich didn't touch the social life of being a low-wage worker, which left me with some unanswered questions. This book, although insightful and sometimes humorous, doesn't deserve 5 stars!

    2 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 10, 2001

    A wake up call for the America Dream

    Barbara Ehrenreich admits from the get go that her foray into the world of the working poor, chronicled in Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, isn't the same as actually living there. She knows the sanctuary of her secure middle-class life awaits, and she can return whenever she wants to. Her experience, therefore, lacks the true desperation of those who have no such means of escape. On the other hand, her knowledge of life outside the barely-above-minimum-wage world of Wal-Mart, of waitressing, of housekeeping and maid service labor, affords her a basis of comparison that the average retail sales associate, waitress, or nursing home aide may never have. With these advantages and disadvantages to accurate reportage, Ehrenreich brings unstinting honesty as the scales and achieves perfect balance. How accurate is her description of life on the down side? I can't speak for waitressing or motel housekeeping, but I spent thirteen months as a Wal-Mart associate and can testify that she nailed it. A perfect 10. From the dehumanization of drug testing and personality surveys, to the propaganda of orientation videos and Sam Walton posters by the break room, through the Wal-Mart cheer, discounts at the Radio Grill, CBLS, and zoning bras, I've been there and done it. I suspect her description of the other 'occupations' she worked at is every bit as accurate, and poignant. That she manages to make some truly horrible situations funny is a tribute not only to her writing, but to the people she worked with. Humor is the one thing they, too, get by on. If you can't laugh at the really bad stuff -- whether it's cleaning other people's toilets or not feeling free to use the toilet at work for fear of being accused of 'time theft' -- you go crazy. Reading Nickel and Dimed, I laughed, and I cried. I saw myself on her pages, but more often I saw the people I left behind when I, too, escaped. The saddest part about Nickel and Dimed is that the people who ought to read it probably won't. The people who think the poor are poor because they don't work (or because they want to be poor, as if anyone really believes that) will never pick up a book like this. It might make them uncomfortable, might make them realize that their comfort is one of the causes. Too many who do buy and read it already know how hard (impossible?) it is to live on $7 a hour, to find affordable decent housing, to assemble nutritious meals, to acquire dependable transportation so they can get to those $7-an-hour jobs on time and not be fired for tardiness. Poverty in the United States is still as invisible as it was when Michael Harrington wrote The Other America in 1962. That book sparked Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty. Maybe Barbara Ehrenreich's Nickel and Dimed will spark a more peaceful and more successful assault.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 24, 2012

    highly recommended

    The setting of this book begins in the place at where Ehrenreich lives, Key West, Florida as she decides to start her low-wage life. The plot of this book begins as Ehrenreich is planning her project on how people live in a low- wage life, and the problems that they may come across, like affording a place to live. After leaving her normal life for this project her first task was to find a place to live, since she figured she would probably make around $7 an hour. But once she found a job at Hearthside she found out that her salary was for $2.43 an hour and eventually decided to find another job at Jerry’s in order to live. From there she started moving a couple of more times because she could not find to work with such a low-wage and have enough money for the necessities she may have to come across. In her evaluation she explains how housing is really expensive but, wages have not increased. The main character of this book was Ehrenreich the one who was doing the project to experience a low- wage job. There were also many other characters in which she came across when she was working at different places. The theme of this book is poverty because poverty had a great role in Ehrenreich’s book throughout the book she demonstrates the difficulty of survival with a low-waged job. She shows that there are so many other people that are actually living their lives with so many limitations and, things they have to sacrifice like health insurance that may eventually leave them in debt if anything ever really happened. Nickel and Dimed, 235 pages.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 25, 2011

    Worthless.

    Nickel and Dimed has all the depth that could be expected of a pseudo activist like Ehrenreich. If you're familiar with any of her other works then you're aware of her child-like and stunted writing style. Her "insights" are largely the result of her own sheltered expierence and her attempts to go native, as it were, are pathetic at best. What could have been a triumph for labor rights instead read like page after page of a vapid, shallow woman saying; "I can't believe I'm doing this! I have money, but I'm working!" Ehrenreich does however illustrate two points very clearly: 1. The ability to write does not make one a writer. and 2. The desire to champion a cause does not make one an activist. For my part I will be quite happy when Ehrenreich goes back to being the laughingstock of the feminist movement and stops her ridiculous posturing as a labor reformer.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 15, 2011

    She Wasted a Good Premise

    "Nickel and Dimed" touches on some important societal questions, specifically, what is minimum-wage life really like? Many of us had such jobs as teenagers, but we also had family support and few expenses. Even without family obligations or crushing debt, can an adult really survive at $7 per hour?

    The book is well written in general, and Ehrenreich's diary-like style captures events as they occur. However, she has clearly set herself up to fail. Even at age 20, I knew enough to ride the bus and get a roommate if I wanted to make ends meet, and I didn't expect to be perfectly comfortable within one month of moving to a new city. Her on-the-job conduct was quite unprofessional at times; she doesn't need the money, so she does things that a real wage-slave wouldn't dare.

    The book would have benefitted greatly from additional research. Ehrenreich could have spoken with her co-workers to see how they get by, debriefed her minimum-wage bosses and gotten their side of the story, or done some research into labor laws to explain why things are the way they are. Instead, she blames every hurdle on The Corporations, who of course are conspiring to keep the little people down. Ehrenreich's personal tale is interesting, but quite one-sided; I would recommend this book as part of a wider cultural-studies program, so her experience may be augmented and countered by other authors.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted September 16, 2010

    I Also Recommend:

    Nickel and Dimed on failing as a writer

    When I chose to read Nickel and Dimed: On not Getting By in America by Barbara Ehrenreich, I had fully expected to be reading an account of a journalist doing some undercover work side by side with some of the more unfortunate workers in America. A description of the book that was written on the back, like on most books, lead me to believe this. I did not expect, however, that this book would be so poorly written and poorly thought out. Ehrenreich's book lacked substance and authority as well as organization. Rather, the book relied on random sensationalist descriptions of everyday occurrences to further the author's agenda. Ehrenreich frequently attempted to ignite racist, feminist or drug user sympathetic sentiments and used them as a weapon against those whom were in conflict with furthering her purpose. After finishing the book, I came away feeling I had been led to hate certain groups of Americans, rather than becoming more informed about the topic originally mentioned in the beginning of the book. In the introduction of the book, Ehrenreich claimed that she would be investigating how someone in America could survive off of a six or seven dollars an hour wage. Numerous times the author referenced specific dollar amounts, however at no point in time had she come to a clear conclusion on whether or not someone could survive off of six or seven dollars an hour and made little attempt to put the information in an easily digestible form. Ehrenreich's commentary in respect to living on a few dollars an hour was lacking. At no time did she directly address whether someone would be able to live off of 6 or 7 dollars an hour and why, rather she just filled the book with rambling about her coworkers and herself. Although, if Ehrenreich had made an attempt to come to a clear conclusion, she would have been working using skewed information. Her methods of investigation were flawed at best. As part of the investigation, the author took up a series of low wage jobs and worked them for a small amount of time. Rather than sampling a large variety of jobs, the author declined various jobs due to personal issues with drug tests, work policies and specific types of labor, limiting the different experiences she could gather and likewise limiting the quality of her investigation. Ehrenreich also had a frequent habit of being misleading while presenting evidence. For example, at many times while the author was working, she had failed to be able to pay for her rent and food and made a habit of stressing that fact. However, this was generally not a direct result of her low wage, but of her frivolous spending. The author spent plenty of money on cigarettes and at times was spending tons of money on cable tv and various other goods. Clearly, cigarettes and TV are not essentials for surviving, thus

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted July 26, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Profound

    Barbara Ehrenreich, a journalist and author living an upper middle class life, set out to experience the world from the perspective of a low wager worker. She picked several cities across the country and spent one month in each, living only on the wages she earned. What she experienced and learned is profound and should be a wakeup call to everyone who believes that all a person needs to do is work hard to succeed in life.

    I read a lot about poverty and the economic struggles of people here in the U.S., so the information (as far as statistics and such) in this book wasn't anything new to me. However, Ehrenreich's voice as an educated woman struggling to make it as a waitress gave the information a new and unique spin. Ehrenreich deserves a ton of credit for taking on this challenge so that she could offer us a personal story, rather than just cold facts.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Page 1 of 14
Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 267 Customer Reviews