Customer Reviews for

The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science

Average Rating 3.5
( 5 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(1)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 5 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Posted January 27, 2009

    Not to be missed!

    I think the point of this book is that media often jumps on the bandwagon of "causes" without checking out both sides of the story. I disagree that there is no backing for the author's views; he provedes plenty. Is he correct in his interpretations of the facts? Perhaps not, but there are points to ponder. Why, for example, is the population of Africa increasing if AIDS is such a scourge? How can you make an AIDS diagnosis without a blood test? And what is the true reason America quit on nuclear power? If it makes you think, it's worth it.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 13, 2006

    Unsettling, to say the least!

    Is this truly the state of environmental affairs in the United States? I am an Environmental Analysis and Design major at the University of California, Irvine. Being of a slightly conservative bent, though, I tend to disagree with certain ultra-liberal takes on the environment. It is for this reason that I like to read both 'pro-environment' literature and skeptical literature. This book, however, should be skipped entirely. Tom Bethell's over-simplification is well suited for those of us who cannot think for ourselves, and have absolutely no scientific foundation whatsoever. Not only does he over-exaggerate as much as (if not more than) those he accuses of hyperbole, he often times seems to misunderstand the science of what he is discussing altogether. Stilted, propagandist writing also weigh down this book to nearly unreadable dribble. If you want to know which environmental issues to brush up on, and how to argue effectively with über-conservative pseudoscientists, buy this book. Those of you who want to truly understand the environment and how we as humans affect it, however, need not waste their time.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 13, 2013

    Annoying and shameful

    The author doesnt even understand the science he supposedly debunks. Much of the time he even invents his own facts, twists the truth to fit his erroneous opinions and generally makes a fool of himself. Just another example of ignorance among religious zealots.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 18, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    A must-read for any armchair scientist

    The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science is a fascinating read. It begins with the assertion that, far from being an indication of scientific "truth," consensus in science is actually an enemy to the field. With that in mind, it aims to present the aspects of science that the media and politics prefer to avoid. What follows is a cohesive, clearly stated critique of many of the popular scientific stances. The follies of global warming, America's terror of nuclear energy, and the Human Genome Project are presented alongside common misconceptions about Columbus, evolution, and the AIDS "epidemic." I found the chapters on hormesis and the nature of cancer particularly thought-provoking. This is well worth reading, even if only to gain a fuller perspective on the scientific debates that occasionally make their way to the public eye.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 23, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 5 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1