- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
Anonymous
Posted August 30, 2008
The truth at last!
Every teacher in America knows this book is right on! Now if only the policy makers will read it!
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
An Insightful Call to Arms
Charles Murray is one of the best known researchers and writers on various public policy topics. He is oftentimes maligned due to the fact that many of his positions and arguments fly in the face of the popular wisdom and challenge some of our most cherished prejudices. In the case of education, those prejudices have been the source of countless "reforms" that have had very little, if any, impact on the actual achievements of students they were meant to help. The latest one of those attempts, the No Child Left Behind act (NCLB) was the immediate inspiration of a series of articles that Charles Murray wrote for the Wall Street Journal. Those articles have been expanded and turned into this book. Because of politically sensitive nature of the topic, Murray is banding backwards to try to make his assumption as uncontroversial as possible and avoid for the most part the minefields of race, class and gender. The four assumptions that he bases all of his arguments are the following:
1. Ability varies.
2. Half of the children are below average.
3. Too many people are going to college.
4. America's future depends on how we educate the academically gifted.
The veracity of some of these assumptions can hardly be questioned - the second one is just a tautology. However, most people don't look education or their intellectual ability rationally, so it is worthwhile emphasizing the obvious. On the other hand the last two assumptions are very politically unpopular, and Murray expends considerable amount of space in backing them up and presenting the best possible arguments in their favor.
Unfortunately, I am not too optimistic that this book will have much of an impact on people who really need to make hard political choices. The real hope for change lays elsewhere - in an increasing number of technological and social developments that will create new pressures on the traditional educational system. The advent of the internet and the growing amount of resources for learning outside of the established educational venues will create an incentive for more flexible and diverse educational experience. The globalization of work will create pressures on schools and colleges to become more open to changes that will bring them in line with reality. In a meanwhile, we have to be grateful that there are people out there like Charles Murray who are willing to write so clearly and persuasively about these issues.
This is also probably Charles Murray's most accessible book so far. It is written in a conversational/polemic style with no footnotes, graphs, or tables. It is a very straightforward read and could be finished in a single sitting. Overall, there is so much going for this book that I really hope it will be read by a very wide audience.3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted January 19, 2009
Set our children free!
Have you been forced to be a star athlete lately? Have you been asked to play Mozart on the piano? What if you had to sit at the piano until the musical notes made sense to you? That is the same thing we're asking certain children to do when we say every student can excel at math, science or literature. Do we keep children after school because they aren't "good" at volleyball? Why is it so difficult to accept that some kids are born with the brain for math or science and other brains are not. We accept that about "physical" abilities. Murray's well-researched ideas about education, including the above, are spot on. Murray suggests we really look hard at our children's abilities before we set them off on a path of failure. It's not the soft bigotry of lower expectation but the hard bigotry of ignoring the individual. He's also correct about sending everyone to college. In a well-documented section on how well average or below average kids actually do in college, Murray shows we're leading them down a path of failure, loss of job experience, and a huge loss of money. We have a tendency to see children in groups. If we can get a certain group of kids into college, we've succeeded in proving the worth of our education system. What if 99% of those kids drop-out. Then what? Murray suggests we start looking at children for all the wonderful offerings they have for this world instead of forcing them all to try to be engineers. Murray is an expert in statistical analysis which is what this book uses to show how we're damaging the very children we think we're helping. It's difficult to argue with the facts. Aren't you all glad you know a good mechanic? Our plumber takes five weeks of vacation and picks and choses his jobs, he's that much in demand. He probably didn't score very highly on the math SAT either. How well did you do?
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
LeahCarr
Posted February 3, 2011
Highly Recommended, a thought provoking examination.
Real Education is, at it's heart, kind. Although I am certain that many people will miss this point. Murray makes a solid case for helping people succeed by not setting them up to fail. He does it in a manner that is compelling, and often, infuriating. Do read the book all the way through to the end-- if you put it down early, you may erroneously walk away with the notion that Murray is an elitist who thinks that only the best and brightest are deserving of education, when in fact he is saying nothing of the kind.
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Short, sweet, and really useful
Murray hits it out of the park on this one! Having hoped to find a hardcover version of the book (I like the more substantive hardcovers for their longevity and ability to absorb wear and tear), I settled for the paperback, but this just made it so much easier to take with me for lunchtime reading and blow through it in just a week or so. Fantastic, straight-forward, and thought-inducing writing, hitting on a few key areas where politicians and education experts dare never speak. Valuable to at least seeing another, different, perspective on how we can return some sanity to our secondary and post-secondary education systems, where so many students are "left behind" or just plain lost.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted November 20, 2008
Also a teacher
What a ignorant point of view. Only the smart deserve a chance? Those that do not measure up are not good enough?
1 out of 11 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted February 14, 2009
Some Valid Points but America was not founded on European Style Elitism as Advocated in this book.
Mr. Murray has a valid point that too many people go to college and we have too many colleges, professional schools etc... A college degree has become what a H.S. diploma was for our grandparents. As a career counselor said those who are in the bottom 40% of their high school class should not be in college.
That said, for Mr. Murray to espouse only those who attend so-called elite colleges should be the gold standard is espousing a "royalty" class, which is what our founding fathers rebelled against and is anti-American. The so-called elite college grads gave us the mortgage crisis, the trillion+ debt our government now has, they did not pay their taxes until nominated for a Cabinet post, the Unabomber went to one of the elite institutions and I could go on.
Those qualified to go to universitiies should not have the brand label syndrome of "elitist" institutions be a road block to their career aspirations. American success is based on self-reliance, risk taking and individualism, not the brand label status symbol mush advocated by Mr. Murray.
Advocating testing intelligence does not reveal how one will perform. All it does is put the emphasis on test taking and studying how to pass the exam not one's ability to apply their knowledge to the real world.
Albert Einstein was a terrible student because he was bored with school, if Mr. Murray's credo was in force then we never would be as advanced technologically as we are because Einstein would not have been allowed to continue his studies.
Sam Walton went to Univ of Missouri and then founded Wal-Mart.
Michael Fisher an extremely successful financier on Wall Street went to the Univ. of Oklahoma.
Two physics professors at the Univ. of Colorado won the Nobel prize in physics for their reasearch relating to their attempt to achieve absolute zero.
A personal experience: I had a roommate who was attending an "elite" medical school. He was in the top of his class grade wise. The school classes used multiple choice testing for exams. Yet when I asked my roommate to explain medical terminology or ideas he fumbled and gave answers that were terrible. He built his whole medical studies around passing multiple choice testing not understanding and learning the knowledge.
I do agree that our current education system is broken and needs to be revamped but what Mr. Murray advocates would not solve anything. It only rehashes what we currently have in a different language. A pig with lipstick is not pretty it is still a pig and a pig with lipstick is what Mr. Murray is advocating in his book. But what can one expect from a proponent of the Bell Curve?
Part of the current problem with our current educational system is too much of an emphasis on "testing" exactly what Mr. Murray advocates. He gives us shallow connect the dot crtiques/answers/solutions to complex problems relating to our current educational system.
I returned this book for a refund and would not recommend it to anyone.0 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted July 21, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 22, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted March 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 30, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted May 24, 2012
No text was provided for this review.