Customer Reviews for

The Republican War on Science

Average Rating 3.5
( 16 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(9)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 16 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 17, 2006

    Great Work

    I don't know what our GOP scientist here is talking about but Mooney's work is not an indictment of the GOP historically, but instead the current administration's policies of 'Junk Science' and blatant disregard for sound decision making in the face of overwhelming data. If his cronies could make a buck off of it, my 'republican scientist' friend, Bush would insist the stars in the sky were made of marshmallows. Sadly, there are too many 'scientists' that betray their field by accepting Bush's word as not only political doxa, but natural law. Too many of Bush's 'scientist' supporters are far busier being self-assured and towing the line than they are practicing and supporting real science-driven policies that are sound and well-supported by empirical evidence, not profit. Sir, you should have put your name on your review, maybe you could have squeezed some grant funding out of this lame duck.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted February 17, 2014

    As the title attests this book's theme is highly political. It

    As the title attests this book's theme is highly political. It was written during the second term of the George W. Bush Administration and its primary goal was to establish that "W" was unabashedly "anti-science". Looking back at The Republican War on Science from the perspective of nearly a decade, provides a good example of how one's judgments may be somewhat skewed by proximity.
    The Republican War on Science would probably have been better titled The Republican War on the Science Establishment. The author, Chris Mooney, a reporter, tries too hard to lump a diverse number of topics into one basket. Stem cell research, creationism, endangered species, abortion, sex education, acid rain, star wars, sugar & obesity, dietary salt, condoms & HIV, second-hand smoke, mercury in fish, ozone depletion and climate change are all dealt with in more or less detail. Granted that all these topics came up during the second-Bush administration, but are they all examples of "anti-science", or were many of the positions taken by the Bush administration simply a bias in favor of industry positions and those of Bush's conservative base? Many of these "wars" have continued after Bush left office and, although some may still be associated with the Republican party, others are clearly independent of, even, U.S. politics entirely. For example, creationism's true "war on science" has persisted for nearly a century and virulent anti-science/reason has become, if anything, more prevalent globally today than it was a decade ago.
    Also, rather than being strictly "anti-science", some of the positions taken in opposition to "established" science attempted to wrap themselves in the trappings of science, however pathetically, rather than reject science entirely. For example, both the adult vs. embryonic stem cell and anti-abortion movements have not been motivated by the same need to deny the validity of science as is the creationist movement. As Mooney touches on himself early in this book, both the adult stem cell and pro-life movements made the unfortunate decision to augment their fundamentally moral arguments with the trappings of science. They did so because they wanted to escape the bias that all moral argument is "religious" and, therefore, to be shunned in all "objective" discussion. The same could be said for many industry assaults on accepted science norms - industry is not so much anti-science as pro money. Although the author protests that he is not in favor of a technocracy, all too often it is hard to conclude that he, when it comes to the application of science, favors anything else. Perhaps Mooney failed to pursue the thread suggested by those conflicts because he realized it would undermine the basis of the rest of his book? And, for that matter, has the passage time vindicated, despite what the science establishment considered weak science at the time, movements such as the adult stem cell campaign?

    With more than 100 pages of combined notes and credits The Republican War on Science is unquestionably soundly researched even though its basic premise is flawed. Anti-science and anti-reason are real trends in modern society, but they are not entirely Republican, entirely Bush, or entirely conservative.
    Richard R. Pardi Environmental Science William Paterson University

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 28, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    Little Explored Topic

    We would think that this would be a more explored topic, but I guess it should not be a surprise due to the fact that it is a fatal mistake to be in the public eye and share any view other than you believe in a spaceman in the sky of some form.

    In a society where forgetting to put a flag pin on your lapel can be political suicide. Politicians in general believe the American public is a collection of idiots but the Republican Right takes it to a even more drastic level.

    As this book points out, the right has decided that it is politically advantageous to choose their political positions based upon what the religious believe. Unfortunately it makes sense, if your motivation is votes.

    If your motivation is saving your paralyzed 4yr old daughter and that stem cell research might make her walk again, you might then change your position and if you can dig that, you'll dig this book.

    1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted April 6, 2009

    A view of political warfare

    No doubt the author takes a stance and points to the manipulation of knowledge, a basic construct of power politics, specifically with respect to scientific knowledge and those issues which either affect us directly or are, simply, amenable to the political football game. It is well for teachers to understand that this type of issue is critical and integral to the education process, that is, the ability to see through the voluminous barrage of information we face every day to the underlying facts.

    This book needs to be read with concern and without the "shock and awe" produced by upsetting ideas. Rather, it should be read as a perspective on what politics has become and where it is going and, in addition and most importantly, it should represent a clear case for life long education, definitely reading ... which takes us back, again, to the educational process.

    An excellent book for anyone who wants to use their peripheral vision.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 10, 2006

    comprehensive view of the abuse of science by republicans today

    The argument made by Chris Mooney in this book, that the current Republican-led federal government has abused and misused science for the benefit of religious conservatives and big business, is wholly convincing. The author gives his work a diachronic perspective by starting with developments withing the GOP several decades ago, leading up to the current situation. He does not imply that Teddy Roosevelt had ANYTHING to do with misuse of science, because that has nothing to do with current developments in the 21st century. Several topics are tackled in the book as case studies, including evolution, stem cell research, sex education, food industries and climate change. The extensive detail of the book can be daunting for those of us unfamiliar with all the politicians and organizations involved. That being said, it appears that the author tried carefully to cover all his bases in trying to make the information available for his readers, rather than simplifying issues too extensively.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 7, 2006

    Shocking for a Scientist to be Unscientific - Terrible Cliche Book

    This book warrants at best, the nearest trash can. As a scientist - and a republican - I can assert I know what I am talking about. I think the author patently ignores the fact-based scientific method and choses unscientic stereotyping to infer that to be a member of the GOP (the GOP that produced, for example Theodore Roosevelt) means to be ignorant and unscientific. Not so. Yes, I am the minority in the science world, and I am a centrist really - but if there is a problem with a given administration, it is wholly unscientific to pigeon-hole the whole of the GOP there too.... It would be as if I said 'democrats have wholly incompetent leaders, therefore scientists (democrats?) are having problems with moving Science forward in government because their ability to lead and have vision with discipline is wholly lacking.'... I know - I have to see it daily....

    1 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted October 11, 2005

    What should drive policy

    This book really shows that many Republicans write policy on what they think often times without looking at the facts. Their position of being pro-business and anti-regulation no matter what shown in this book really shows that science research should be directing policy rather than industry and uniformed elected officals. There seems to be the pattern of have an idea and distort all opposition no matter how many people disagree with you.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted June 28, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Disappointing Read

    Overall, I thought that they author had obviously done his research. But I did not get a goood sense of how to fix the problems that were caused or worsened by the Bush administration.

    0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 17, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 21, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 31, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 24, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 11, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted November 7, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 26, 2014

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted July 6, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 16 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1