Customer Reviews for

Seeds of Deception

Average Rating 3.5
( 8 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 1, 2007

    If you think GM foods are safe, think again.

    I have not tracked the genetically engineered food issue carefully, having only seen mainstream media reporting. BEFORE I started reading this book, I thought that: 1. The genetic engineering technique is very precise and duplicatable, inserting single genes into a plant's DNA that do a precise job. 2. Genetically modified 'GM' food is essentialy the same as the non-GM counterpart. 3. There are few if any known serious health risks from eating most GM food 4. GM practices can reduce pesticide use because the plant has its own pesticide. This is an environmental benefit. 5. GM food can increase yields, given the same amount of land for growing - which has been a great benefit in some third world countries. 6. There are considerable environmental risks that have probably not been ade1quately studied. For example, monarch butterflies were being harmed in GM fields. Overall I felt that the issue was not very clear cut, there were great advantages, but caution is also advised. AFTER I read this book, I learned that: 1. The GM technique is extremely imprecise, it is like shooting a shotgun of genes at a bunch of DNA strands, and hoping a few stick. Furthermore, the surrounding genes suffer considerable collateral damage that is impossible to predict the effects of. 2. This collateral damage results in GM food often being very different from the non-GM version, especially in increase of toxins and allergens. 3. There are a number of well documented cases of people getting very sick, and some cases dying from these toxins and allergens. Yet, the FDA and GM biotech industry and mainstream media continues to say that there is little evidence of health risk. 4. One of the most pervasive GM foods is Monsanto's Ready Roundup soy bean. It is specifically designed to be resistant to Monsanto's brand of pesticide. This results in MORE of that pesticide being used. 5. The argument about increased yields to save the planet is often used as a last resort when you point out the truth about GM being an imprecise technique, and that there are serious health risks. It is a way of bringing in a moral dimension that most people will buy. Yet, the planet already has much more food than it needs to feed everyone. This is not the reason for GM foods. Profit is. 6. The environmental risks may be many and unstudied, to be sure. Much more shocking is that there are hardly any careful studies demonstrating that GM food is safe. Basically, scientificaly weak arguments are use to argue that there is no reason to conduct such studies. This is barely scratching the surface, this book is extremely well written and documented. It tells a sobering story of: * Corporate greed, * Rampant conflict of interest with industry being in bed with the FDA, for example: - Scientists warnings are routinely ignored - Monsanto officials come to work at the FDA to make policy, then return to Monsanto - The doctoring of information is much like what the current Bush adminstration has done with scentific reports about global warming. * Most funding for research in GM comes from industry. * People are afraid to do research that might discover inconvenient truths about the safety of GM foods - because they are bullied, threatened and can lose their careers. * Massive media manipulation filters out virtually all anti-GM stories books have gone unpublished for fear of lawsuits by pro-GM companies * Pro-biotech companies and the FDA itself have ample evidence of safety concerns, and they consistently lie about it. It reminds me of the tobacco situation. Some may complain that this book does not present a balanced view. You be the judge. And anyway, even if it is one one-sided, its about that that this side was aired. But don't take it from me, or from the author. Read the book, check the references, and reach your own conclusions. Even if only a few things in this book are true, it has major consequences. I reco

    6 out of 6 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 17, 2003

    Highly recommended, everyone needs to read it!!!

    I thought that this book might be dry but it imparts information in a very readable way. It points out the health hazards of gmo's with clear scientific documented knowledge. It also shows the FDA's failure to properly test gmo's and how when proper tests are done, how haphazard, dangerous, and unknowable the effects of this technology can be. The industry's (including Monsanto esp.) bullying of the media and discrediting of sound scientific testing is exposed. It points out how The gmo industry repeats lies through a massive and consistent PR campaign to keep us ignorant of the facts. Buy this book for friends, family, church libraries, public libraries, and social action groups.

    5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 6, 2004

    Fiction gone bad

    As a professor of agriculture, I have never seen so much misinformation and distortion in one place. This book should be classified as 'fiction.' Given the emotional nature of GMOs, there is a desperate need for accurate information. This is a topic the public clearly needs to debate, but debate should always be based on fact, not fiction. The use of fiction for public debate can only result in flawed public policy. I grade this book an 'F'.

    2 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 5, 2004

    Don't waste your time

    As one who has worked with genetic engineering crops since their introduction, I see only mistruth, deception and lies in this book. For example, the author knows that Golden Rice will reduce death and blindness in Southeast Asia, yet still tries to convince you that this is not the case. GE crops either reduce pesticide use, (and pesticide poisoning) or trade either fossil fuel intensive cultivation or more toxic herbicides for more environmental friendly herbicides, that all homeowners can buy at Home Depot. If you read this work of fiction, note how many times the words potential, possible, hypothetical are used in describing potential hazards of biotechnology. I, for one, am distressed that this book may delay adoption of a breakthrough technology that will improve our environment, reduce starvation and disease, and make farmers around the world better off.

    1 out of 13 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 11, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted October 13, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 17, 2008

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted June 9, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1