Customer Reviews for

The Silent War: The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea

Average Rating 4
( 12 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 4 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 2, 2002

    Project What? Good Work, Secrecy, and the Need to Know

    At first, I felt like the author was holding back, teasing the reader. Farther into the book, I "got with it" and learned to read and interpret with a scientific logic and common sense similar to those that guided Mr. Craven and his colleagues. Craven required that his collaborators have some practical, "field experience". Projects went better that way; less time was wasted on nonproductive ideas. Competence and courage counted. Craven notes that veterans of wartime carnage seemed reluctant to use nuclear weapons, especially in a "preemptive strike". We can assume that his Soviet counterparts, especially those who survived the Great Patriotic War, felt the same way. Others had no such inhibitions. Craven tells a revealing tale of how the Thresher was lost. Navy brass insisted on pre-operational shock testing of all new subs, including those designed to carry nuclear missiles. Craven and his colleagues believed this procedure to be unnecessary and very dangerous. The brass won out; the Thresher sustained undetected damage from the tests and was lost on her maiden voyage. Thereafter, Mr. Craven is silent on shock testing, so may we assume that the Navy mothballed this procedure after the Thresher was lost? I hope so! Although the book is deadly serious, it does have its humorous moments. Mr. Craven describes how he, a progressive liberal, was somehow put on Nixon's "good guy" list, thus insuring his continued participation in the country's most sensitive, top-secret oceanographic projects. After years of "being close to" such projects, reporters sensed that Mr. Craven was in the know, and would contact him by phone. His reply was a prompt and straightforward "project what?" Craven's analyses of two, well-known cold war events deserve mention. One was Korean Air 007 shot down by Soviet aircraft off easternmost Siberia in 1983. Craven believes that the shootdown was ordered locally despite orders to the contrary from the Kremlin. Mr. Craven describes the flight as "mysterious" but offers no additional comment on why the airliner was so far off course and seemed to be a pawn in a hi-stakes poker test, calculated to see how the Russians would respond to the incursion. The other was the strange sinking of a Russian sub that his group eventually recovered from the deep-waters of the central Pacific. Craven concluded that the sub was a rogue positioned to fire a missile armed with a nuclear warhead at Hawaii, a mission not authorized by nor known to Moscow. Both the rogue sub and the Korean Air 007 incidents were subsequently used by the U.S. to help convince Soviet negotiators that arms control was in the best interests of both countries. I enjoyed the book. It gives the reader a rare, inside look at the highly competitive, top secret game of intelligence gathering and national security interests and how these can be well served by scientific research and new technologies, despite ample doses of disinformation, obfuscation, and "the need to know".

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted March 21, 2001

    Some Things Left Unsaid

    John Pina Craven's book is an interesting and at times enlightening glimpse into his life and career. Pros: he describes his work from his point of view as Chief Scientist of the Navy's Special Projects Office. The projects he describes (Polaris, deep sea submergence, submarine recovery) are all fascinating. Cons: the writing and editing leave much to be desired, the book is choppy, sometimes repetitive. The stories too often whet your appetite for more, but Craven is duty-bound not to tell. What you're left with is Craven's rehash of what's already public knowledge, along with hints that there's a much more fascinating tale that he cannot tell. A good companion book to Blind Man's Bluff, by Sontag.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 4 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1