Customer Reviews for

Situation Ethics

Average Rating 4
( 3 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 23, 2006

    There Are Better Points-of-View But

    There are many things right with this book, though, perhaps, it is too easy to confuse Professor Fletcher¿s situation ethics with the much more nuanced contextual ethics of the superior theologian Paul Lehmann. Regardless, Professor Fletcher made us think about the consequences of our ethical reflection. Professor James M. Gustafson¿s comparison study Protestant and Roman Catholic Ethics: Prospects for Rapprochement,

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 20, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    I Also Recommend:

    Sixties Ethical Formation

    I agree with another reviewer that Paul Lehmann is a superior theologian, but Professor Fletcher's book was helpful. He contrasted his Protestant concern with the consequences of ethical conduct with the moral absolutism of Catholic ethics. He is not a moral relativist despite what some of his critics claim. In the end, I think that Professor Gustafson might have trumped both Lehmann and Fletcher, but both are well worth reading, especially Professor Lehmann. Professor Fletcher posited a helpful correction to the kind of absolutism that has haunted the past few decades of political life in the United States. Fletcher and Lehmann both realize that the notion of Christian ethic is suspect and, thus, cleared a way for Gustafson's expression of this insight. Good example of ethical formation during the sixties.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted July 25, 2004

    Thou shall not...

    There was many things that was wrong in this book. Fletcher claims to be a utilitarinist and also a pragmatist. Dewey's pragmatism claims that utilitarism is wrong because of empirical reasons. Fletcher also forgets where the evil comes from.The story he told was of a group of people hiding from murderers and a baby was crying. The mother killed the baby to keep it silent to save the group. But was the evil coming from the crying baby or the murderers? Fletcher a devout believer in Chirst, says in this book that a Chirstian can believe in homosexuality and every other sex act because Christ fails to mention it in the gospels. Very Stupid! The icing on the cake is when he tries to persuade his moral argument with a quote from Lenin, the man responsible for the Soviet Union and suffering,death,and the almost total annialation of the world. If anything that should tell you how wrong he is. One thing that he did say that was right though, was he said that modern Christian theogians and mainstream Christianity are situationist, but dont' even see it

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing all of 3 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1