Customer Reviews for

The Nature Of Asatru

Average Rating 3.5
( 5 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star


4 Star


3 Star


2 Star


1 Star


Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation


  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 1 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 25, 2006

    Not an Objective Look into Asatru

    I bought this book with an open mind, but found myself disappointed. First, 'the Norroena Society Presents' is a misleading comment, suggesting the very same organization that issued the very impressive 15-v. 'Anglo Saxon Classics' a century ago- it isn't. These folks merely have taken the name. Getting into the book itself, it is written in a good style, but isn't objective. Rather, it is merely one man's opinion. Statements such as 'no one can claim to be an authority on our path, since we have the freedom to accept or reject any idea or tradition' invalidates the very work of those diligent researchers who *are* rightful authorities on Germanic religion. So too, such an attitude suggests something more of a 'make up the religion as you go along' sort of mentality that would leave Asatru at the same level of other less- or non-rooted 'neo-pagan' religions or would-be religions. The concepts of 'Helthing' and 'Runelaw' are interesting, but not (historically) founded, remaining a creation of the author, rather than something attested in historical sources.. Rune-names presented in the text as 'Gothic' are actually based on Indo-European, rather than Gothic, proper: Laguz for Laaz (as preserved in the Salzburg manuscript), based on lagus Fehu instead of Faihu Tiwaz instead of Tyz (Sal.), based on Teiws (or even tius, as Grienberger suggests) Dagaz instead of Daaz (Sal.) or Dags, just to name a few. For the price paid and expectations, I am thoroughly disappointed.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted September 21, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 2 review with 1 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1