BN.com Gift Guide
Customer Reviews for

The Washington Times

Average Rating 4
( 76 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(42)

4 Star

(14)

3 Star

(10)

2 Star

(4)

1 Star

(6)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously

Most Helpful Favorable Review

24 out of 26 people found this review helpful.

Washington Times, the real D.C. paper

The Washington Times is replete with intelligent and thought provoking journalism. It is the model on which journalists should aspire. Unfortunately, its business model is failing in a town of latchkey liberals. While I don't always agree with the editorials, the pap...
The Washington Times is replete with intelligent and thought provoking journalism. It is the model on which journalists should aspire. Unfortunately, its business model is failing in a town of latchkey liberals. While I don't always agree with the editorials, the paper is well written and informative. For comparison, if the Washington Times is FoxNews, the Washington Post is MSNBC.

posted by Doc_R on February 21, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review

Most Helpful Critical Review

2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

Good, when it works

I've had a subscription for 1 month. In that time I've received two papers that I couldn't open to read (frustrating) and one paper that locked up my nook with an inappropriate message on the screen. Even after restarting the nook all three times I couldn't read the pap...
I've had a subscription for 1 month. In that time I've received two papers that I couldn't open to read (frustrating) and one paper that locked up my nook with an inappropriate message on the screen. Even after restarting the nook all three times I couldn't read the paper those days. The writing is good, but the e-paper frequently has spelling errors. I didn't do any research before subscribing - merely based my choice on other reviews. I would recommend purchasing a few issues of several papers and see what you like best (and see if any of them cause problems on your nook).

posted by 489243 on September 16, 2010

Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 76 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 4
  • Posted February 21, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Washington Times, the real D.C. paper

    The Washington Times is replete with intelligent and thought provoking journalism. It is the model on which journalists should aspire. Unfortunately, its business model is failing in a town of latchkey liberals. While I don't always agree with the editorials, the paper is well written and informative. For comparison, if the Washington Times is FoxNews, the Washington Post is MSNBC.

    24 out of 26 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted August 14, 2010

    Conscise, factual, unbiased

    This is newspaper reporting the way it used to be and the way it should be. Unfortunately, too may of today's papers suffer from editorial spill-over into news items, and the whole paper ends up being a biased editorial. As a result, you are deprived of the "straight news" and are unable to make up your own mind because you are deprived of the facts. The NY Times, LA Times, WA Post, Boston Globe, Chicago Sun Time, Miami Herald and others suffer from this affliction. The news items in the Washington Times are not editorials. It's a pleasure to read. It has very good columnists who do not fabricate or plagiarize, which is something these days.

    9 out of 11 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 21, 2010

    more from this reviewer

    Fair And Balance

    I love a Newspaper that gives just the facts and no spin. These scribes live up to their words.

    8 out of 10 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 12, 2012

    Comprehensive coverage

    I love this newspaper! It covers the nation, politics, and international news among other topics. The stories are also laid out in an easy way to read. They read just like the books, side to side, instead of up and down, like a magazine to which I subscribed. The writers are good, respectful, and fair. I dropped Time magazine after I began this subscription.

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted December 13, 2013

    great newspaper

    great newspaper

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted August 6, 2012

    Poor Editing

    Throughout the whole newspaper, question marks that are upside down. I foound this to be very distracting. Do not underdtand their function.

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted June 1, 2012

    Nationals

    Go Nats

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted April 2, 2012

    Right wing extreme newspaper

    I like a balanced approach to reporting. This paper is extreme conservative right wing oriented! Not my cup of java!

    0 out of 2 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 11, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 22, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 8, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted April 29, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 12, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted December 12, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted May 16, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted March 4, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted September 12, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 6, 2013

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted January 6, 2012

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted August 29, 2011

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing 1 – 20 of 76 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 4