- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Posted February 25, 2013
I had a toxic electromagnetic exposure from a high powered solar
I had a toxic electromagnetic exposure from a high powered solar photovoltaic system and this made me curious about alternate energy systems and the toxicity of them. I was not surprised to find that there were problems in wind power as well. They both use electronic inverter systems that produce harmonics. There has been little to no research done on the toxicity of electronically generated AC electricity and the human health impacts. This book does a good job of exploring the problems around wind turbines and I hope that the next edition adds a chapter on electronically generated energy, high electromagnetic fields, stray voltage/current/frequency, and the known human health effects.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
Superb study of wind power
This superb book shows the extreme folly of relying on wind power for reliable electricity supply.Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.
In November 2008, the Minister for Energy and Climate Change said that gas-fired and coal-fired electricity cost £50 per megawatt hour (MWh) to generate and nuclear power cost £38. By contrast, offshore wind cost £92, onshore wind £72.
To keep the uneconomic option of wind power alive, the government has made us all pay huge hidden subsidies, through our electricity bills, to wind power companies. As the 2003 Energy White Paper admitted, "We have . introduced a Renewables Obligation for England and Wales in April 2002. This will incentivize generators to supply progressively higher levels of renewable energy over time. The cost is met through higher prices to consumers. . By 2010, it is estimated that this support and Climate Change Levy exemption will be worth around £1 billion a year to the UK renewables industry."
Yet by 2007, Britain's 2,400 wind turbines generated just 1.3 per cent of our electricity, and even this paltry supply was not reliable. The 2008 House of Lords Select Committee on The Economics of Renewable Energy said, "To make up for its intermittency . back-up conventional plant will be essential to guarantee supply when required, to compensate for wind's very low capacity credit. Wind generation should be viewed largely as additional capacity to that which will need to be provided, in any event, by more reliable means; and the evidence suggests that its full costs, although declining over time, remain significantly higher than those of conventional or nuclear generation."
So wind power cannot replace coal, gas, oil or nuclear - it depends on them 'to guarantee supply when required'. Wind power won't even save CO2 emissions. As Etherington points out, "the Government's own figure for saving of CO2 emission by renewables power generation, mainly wind, is just 9.2 million tonnes per year by 2010 . This is less than the emission from a medium sized coal fired power station."
Wind farms also harm the environment, spoiling our landscapes and killing large numbers of birds and bats.