Customer Reviews for

This Is Not a Book: Philosophical Games and Thought Experiments to Give Your Mind a Workout

Average Rating 3
( 8 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(2)

4 Star

(1)

3 Star

(2)

2 Star

(2)

1 Star

(1)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 2, 2008

    A reviewer

    This book is a poorly written, shallow, and misleading survey of philosophy. Ironically, the title of this tome describes it faithfully. It's not substantial enough to be called a book at all. In addition, the book is very poorly designed. Someone needs to tell the designer that black type is hard to read on dark colored paper. The Queen of the Sciences deserves to have more thorough and thoughtful treatment.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 13, 2008

    Good content, terrible design...

    Thought provoking and a good introduction to history's most famous philosophers. There is only one problem with this book, but it's a big one: it's printed on dark, earth tone pages. I don't understand how anyone could have thought this was a good idea. I can only read a few pages at a time before my eyes get worn out. It's really a shame, because the content is terrific.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted January 21, 2014

    Tiny grey print on a taupe background made it unreadable.  Save

    Tiny grey print on a taupe background made it unreadable.  Save your eyes and money.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted May 10, 2010

    The book is a comprehensive survey of philosophy.

    The cover said "Philosophical Games and Thought Experiments to Give Your Mind a Workout." I'm up to page 26 and the questions remind me of the end-of-chapter questions in textbooks; not very engaging. The book is 150 pages long, excluding the index. It is a good summary of philosophy starting with epistemology, and going on through ethics and morality, metaphysics and spirtuality, and into logic and infinity. I was expecting a more lighthearted Philosophy-for-dummies book and it is not that.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Posted March 30, 2009

    more from this reviewer

    I Also Recommend:

    What an AMAZING book!

    This book broadens your mind with fun, quick and witty games. If you like to think and have fun at the same time, you should defiantly read this book. I highly recommend it.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted November 16, 2008

    "deliciously challenging" "this effort is to be encouraged"

    Review of first edition by Allen & Unwin, quoted from Sunday Age, <BR/>Sunday 21/10/2007, <BR/>Page: 33 Section: Supplements. <BR/>Region: Melbourne Circulation: 225,000 Type: Capital City Daily. <BR/><BR/>THIS IS NOT A BOOK, by<BR/>Michael Picard. <BR/>Yes it is, a surprisingly cheap hardback. It also has the novelty of being printed on recycled paper, in colours from green to brown. In it, Michael Picard does philosophy for the "wondering masses". As he notes, philosophy has never been solely for the elite, and everyone muses at some point about the meaning of existence. The un-book begins with epistemology, and ends with Georg Cantor. In between, Picard explores everything from Buddha to Einstein. The whole is conceived in bite-sized sections, easily digestible. Each ends with a logic or deductive game, to provide amusement with the education. The result is rather more interactive than a "Philosophy for Dummies". In an era when everyone from government down seems hell-bent on encouraging stupidity, this effort is to be encouraged. Drawback: text is less legible on coloured paper. <<n.b.: corrected for second printing in 2008.<BR/><BR/>Review of first edition by Allen & Unwin, quoted from Sunday Telegraph<BR/>Sunday 21/10/2007<BR/>Page: 103 Section: Insider<BR/>Region: Sydney Circulation: 671,500 Type: Capital City Daily<BR/>By Lucy Clark <BR/><BR/>THIS IS NOT A BOOK<BR/>Dr Michael Picard<BR/>Dr Picard maintains that the average person with a house, a job and a car still wonders what the hell it all means sometimes", which is his way of saying that philosophy isn¿t just for scholarly minds.<BR/>He therefore takes a good, thorough (and accessible) look at philosophical thinking and ;0 exercises the reader's mind with a range quizzes and tests that get you scratching ur head and looking for solutions.<BR/>Picard doesn't just ponder life's imponderables, he teaches the reader how to take a logical approach to problems big and small. It's deliciously challenging for those who like to have the foundations of their knowledge shaken up.<BR/><BR/>Review of first edition by Allen & Unwin, quoted from Sunday Mail Brisbane Sunday 14/10/2007<BR/>Page: 18 Section: Event<BR/>Region: Brisbane Circulation: 592,440 Type: Capital City Daily<BR/><BR/>This is Not a Book<BR/>Dr Michael Picard<BR/><BR/>'French Canadian Dr Michael Picard maintains that the average person with a house, job and car still wonders "what the hell it all means sometimes" ¿ his way of saying philosophy is not just for scholarly minds. He scrutinises philosophical thinking and exercises the reader¿s mind with quizzes to get them looking for solutions. With a bent for analytical thinking, Picard teaches the reader how to logically approach problems big and small.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 24, 2009

    No text was provided for this review.

  • Anonymous

    Posted February 28, 2010

    No text was provided for this review.

Sort by: Showing all of 8 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1