Customer Reviews for

The Web Content Style Guide: An Essential Reference for Online Writers, Editors and Managers

Be the first to write a review
( 0 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(0)

4 Star

(0)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(0)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted February 1, 2002

    Alright as a styleguide, but apsires to too much

    <br><br>This book is written by people trained as writers and therefore should be viewed as a writer's view of web content development. In that capacity the book does provide a good general dictionary of internet terms, and a basic description of approaches to writing, and structuring content for the web. <br><br> What is disturbing about this book is its assumption that it can use its expertise in the area of writing to proclaim authority in other areas of web development, including site architecture and web site usability, while at the same time being only barely informed of the long development history of these disciplines. <br><br> The book goes as far as positing the notion that all highly trafficked web sites exist based on the same principles (or standards) of writing, architecture, and usability. To support this argument the authors go on to confuse site architecture and site usability with web graphic design-- all aspects of under the larger umbrella term: web design. <br><br> Confused yet?<br><br> The authors then reinforce this confused theory of standards by viewing only web sites that resemble each other in scale and function. One can then only assume that the standards here described don't hold up for the other types of web design which the authors have chosen to ignore. <br><br> This must be the case because the creators of those other types of sites are admonished as being irresponisble, and uninformed in the ways of web content style.<br><br> I must suppose that it has ever occurred to the folks writing this book that a web designer could be anything other than a graphic artist... It is in that assumption that authors show their age and bias. Only persons trained in traditional media would apply the same rules and relationships to this area of new media, as had been applied in the old. <br><br> Perhaps that's also why what's written here seems in many ways to be a zealous and curiously contrstructed attempt to reign in the vast variety of the web under a form of editorial control. While one would agree that such control is desireable, the lengths that this book go to to present that notion are extreme-- adding additional confusion to an area that is already rife with misinformation.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 Customer Reviews
Page 1 of 1