Customer Reviews for

What Jane Austen Ate and Charles Dickens Knew: From Fox Hunting to Whist - the Facts of Daily Life in Nineteenth-Century England

Average Rating 4.5
( 9 )
Rating Distribution

5 Star

(7)

4 Star

(1)

3 Star

(0)

2 Star

(1)

1 Star

(0)

Your Rating:

Your Name: Create a Pen Name or

Barnes & Noble.com Review Rules

Our reader reviews allow you to share your comments on titles you liked, or didn't, with others. By submitting an online review, you are representing to Barnes & Noble.com that all information contained in your review is original and accurate in all respects, and that the submission of such content by you and the posting of such content by Barnes & Noble.com does not and will not violate the rights of any third party. Please follow the rules below to help ensure that your review can be posted.

Reviews by Our Customers Under the Age of 13

We highly value and respect everyone's opinion concerning the titles we offer. However, we cannot allow persons under the age of 13 to have accounts at BN.com or to post customer reviews. Please see our Terms of Use for more details.

What to exclude from your review:

Please do not write about reviews, commentary, or information posted on the product page. If you see any errors in the information on the product page, please send us an email.

Reviews should not contain any of the following:

  • - HTML tags, profanity, obscenities, vulgarities, or comments that defame anyone
  • - Time-sensitive information such as tour dates, signings, lectures, etc.
  • - Single-word reviews. Other people will read your review to discover why you liked or didn't like the title. Be descriptive.
  • - Comments focusing on the author or that may ruin the ending for others
  • - Phone numbers, addresses, URLs
  • - Pricing and availability information or alternative ordering information
  • - Advertisements or commercial solicitation

Reminder:

  • - By submitting a review, you grant to Barnes & Noble.com and its sublicensees the royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable right and license to use the review in accordance with the Barnes & Noble.com Terms of Use.
  • - Barnes & Noble.com reserves the right not to post any review -- particularly those that do not follow the terms and conditions of these Rules. Barnes & Noble.com also reserves the right to remove any review at any time without notice.
  • - See Terms of Use for other conditions and disclaimers.
Search for Products You'd Like to Recommend

Recommend other products that relate to your review. Just search for them below and share!

Create a Pen Name

Your Pen Name is your unique identity on BN.com. It will appear on the reviews you write and other website activities. Your Pen Name cannot be edited, changed or deleted once submitted.

 
Your Pen Name can be any combination of alphanumeric characters (plus - and _), and must be at least two characters long.

Continue Anonymously
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1
  • Anonymous

    Posted May 22, 2004

    Disappointing at best

    This was a very informative book. However, it was also chock-full of typographical errors. At first you could reason as to what the author was trying to say. But the errors kept getting worse and worse. Anyone who has read some of the literature that Mr. Pool quotes will be offended at the lack of editorial correction or research. This would have been an excellent book if it were not for the repeated mistakes. One instance was when Mr. Pool was referring to the book Our Mutual Friend. He kept discussing a character named 'Eugene Hexam.' Now if you have read the book then you know that there is no 'Eugene Hexam.' There is a Eugene Wrayburn and a Charlie Hexam, however. This is annoying but not detrimental to the plot and structure of the book until he refers to 'Eugene Hexam' as a creepy schoolmaster. Once again, if you are familiar with the book you will know that the schoolmaster's name was Bradley Headstone. Perhaps the author had trouble with the facts in this one book, right? Wrong. Later on he makes a comment about the book 'Jude the Obscure' and wrongfully titles it as 'Jude the Observer.' I shudder to think of the people who have their literary characters mixed up because of the mistakes in this book. After reading this book one can conclude that either the author did not research his facts, (And if this is the case how much of the book is fact?), or that the editor was very lax in his editing.

    5 out of 5 people found this review helpful.

    Was this review helpful? Yes  No   Report this review
Sort by: Showing 1 review with 2 star rating   See All Ratings
Page 1 of 1