- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
-
The cast makes this an entertaining well written Victorian romance
In 1877 Greydon Kane knows contrary to popular belief a duke cannot always get what he wants for he cannot have the woman he loves. Thus he goes to Saint's Row seeking pleasure with someone who resembles his beloved but untouchable (for him that is) Rose, whom he is charged to protect not seduce.
Rose Danvers wants one person, Grey. She goes to Saint's Row knowing he will be there hoping to steal a kiss at the masquerade ball. When she succeeds, she hopes for step two of bed and wed with her beloved admitting he loves her like she does him. However, once he discovers her identity, Grey believes a romance between them is taboo so he will find her a suitable husband.
The cast makes this an entertaining well written Victorian romance. Out of honor, duty and the Martingale mother-daughter and outraged patriarch scandal that he caused, Grey denies who he wants most in the world because his innocent ward deserves someone better than him. Rose refuses to accept his honorable relationship and goes after who she wants. Fans will relish this engaging gender war as Rose tries to seduce her duke.
Harriet Klausner1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Historicalromancefan
Posted August 9, 2010
One of my very favorite books!
I read this book twice and I absolutely loved it! The language, the characters and their relationships and the plot were all amazingly well written. This is definetely a keeper and I recommend if you read it, to set aside a few hours because you won't be able to put it down!
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted January 10, 2010
I Also Recommend:
Seduced!
Thoruoughly enjoyed the story and it's character's. I can't wait to read Kathryn's next historical romance book.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged. -
Anonymous
Posted October 1, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 17, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 26, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 30, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted March 3, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted September 16, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted December 9, 2009
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 9, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted April 28, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 8, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted July 25, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 27, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted August 26, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted February 12, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted September 28, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 11, 2010
No text was provided for this review.
-
Anonymous
Posted January 17, 2010
No text was provided for this review.