Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date.

For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now.

Dinosaur Mummies: Beyond Bare-Bone Fossils

Dinosaur Mummies: Beyond Bare-Bone Fossils

3.7 3
by Kelly Milner Halls

See All Formats & Editions

Most people know what dinosaurs looked like from their fossilized skeletons, but have you ever wondered what their skin and muscles looked like? With crisp photographs and illustrations of fossilized dinosaur embryos, a real dinosaur's heart, and more, explore these "mummified" dinosaur discoveries."

Customer Reviews

Average Review:

Post to your social network


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

See all customer reviews

Dinosaur Mummies: Beyond Bare-Bone Fossils 3.7 out of 5 based on 0 ratings. 3 reviews.
Guest More than 1 year ago
Internet website information filtered through a nonscientist emerges as misinterpretations on fossilization and dinosaurs. It would have made a better picture book. The book misleads the reader with the painting on the cover. There is NO TYRANNOSAURUS REX preserved this way. Children will think that there is a complete Tyrannosaurus rex which died and dried out a tiny bit. The author's childhood experiences begin the book, which should have been deleted. Did a science editor work on the book? Tectonic plates have nothing to do with fossilization. The plate tectonics theory explains why the Earth's continents are drifting apart, not why plants and animals may become fossilized and then exposed through erosion. 'The fossils lay buried for what scientists believe to be millions of years.' Believe? There were only 'thousands of hadrosaurs' during a multimillion year time frame? ¿Hadrosaurs lived in healthy groups for thousands of years.' Is there confusion between thousands and millions? Inaccurate and sloppy writing¿the book should have shown pictures and then the websites where the information originated. Illustrations by Rick Spears look like coloring book pages. Children would learn more by studying paintings by paleoartists Michael Skrepnick or Mark Hallett to see what dinosaurs probably looked like. Some of the mistakes in the book: Robert Bakker is not affiliated with the Tate Museum, and Edmonton is not a region in Canada but a city. The museum in North Carolina is the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, not North Carolina Museum of Natural History or North Carolina Museum of Sciences. The text uses all three versions. Filaments are not the 'hard center cores of feathers. Dr. Schweitzer's name is misspelled twice. Santanaraptor is dog-sized only if your dog is 6 feet long or tall. A poor understanding and explanation of the structure of feathers is again shown in the section on Sinornithosaurus. Dr. Paul Sereno is with the University of Chicago, not the Field Museum. The article on him is very, very similar to the 7-21-01 on-line Beloit Daily News story, which is not credited. The discovery was not in Wyoming but South Dakota. 'It's' is used incorrectly in the article about Dr. Karen Chin, and she is referred to as a 'girl.' 'Herivores' is a misspelling. Lynette Gillette is called a 'he.' Crocodiles do not lay their eggs and then 'leave the would-be hatchlings to fend for themselves.' The name of one of the authors of 'Dinosaurs: Biggest...' is misspelled, as is Dr. Currie's in 'Feathered Dinosaurs.' The 'JPI Dinosaur Field Guide' recommendation incompletely states '...make this a fun, unique field guide for dinosaur.' Punctuation problems, as in 'Andrews's.' What does '...thanks in to Brian Selznick's ...' mean? 'North Caroline' is a state? Recommended instead is the forthcoming 'Discovering Dinosaurs With a Fossil Hunter (I Like Science)' by Judith Williams, any of the books by Dr. Thomas Holtz, and Luis Rey's 'A Field Guide to Dinosaurs,' all of which are scientifically accurate and beautifully illustrated. Dinosaur Mummies, once unwrapped, is a fake.
Guest More than 1 year ago
It is unfortunate that some people intentionally misrepresent the facts. It's unkindness I've never understood. But that is precisely what the person who posted the 'muddled' review has done. She's not only malicious, she's almost completely wrong. First of all, she says it should have been a picture book. It IS a picture book written by a journalist not a scientist -- for young readers. I did not say tectonic plates helped 'make' fossils, I said they helped bring them to the surface of the earth where erosion reveals them to fossil hunters. Atlanta's Fernbank Science Center exhibit designer and illustrator Rick Spears created lovely dinosaur drawings based on solid science and the audience for which the book was written. Kids LOVE them, and so do I -- even if she doesn't. I said Dr. Bakker helped create the Tate Museum in Wyoming. He did. There is a tyrannosaur 'mummy' on the cover because one prominent paleontologist reported in several publications that he hoped he'd found a mummified tyrannosaur. It's reported as a 'hopeful' find in the book -- not as fact. Kids will only be misled when they read her review. The scientists I interviewed DO believe Leonardo is the find of a lifetime. She says the book is obsessed with 'poop.' I have one sidebar on coprolites because fossilized dinosaur dung is interesting. My editor was a science editor for many years prior to overseeing DINOSAUR MUMMIES. Very few National Geographic stock photos are featured, but I'm proud to think those few are part of the book. I don't think it gets any better than National Geographic. The balance of the photos are from the scientists I interviewed, museums and newspapers. This woman didn't like my book's introduction. Fine. If she ever writes a book of her own, she can write the introduction her way. She doesn't like the books I recommended. See the advice I offered about the introduction. I could go on and on, but I won't. I'll close by saying my book is not a science journal. It's a book for kids, meant to excite them and get them asking questions. I hope they fall in love with dinosaurs after they read what the experts have told me in this book. Kirkus, Booklist (starred review), the National Science Teachers Association, Dr. Peter Dodson, Dr. James Farlow, the Peabody Museum, and many, many sources willing to go public, rather than hiding behind the word 'anoynmous' say I did a good, solid job. Is it perfect? Probably not. What books are? And this person is free to spit poison like the fictional dinosaurs in Jurassic Park, the movie. As for me, I'll keep trying to write books for kids because I respect and appreciate kids. My work may not always be perfect (no matter how hard I work to translate tough concepts for young minds). But it WILL always be honest and well intentioned. That's more than I can say for this 'review.'
Guest More than 1 year ago
As the author of this book, just a couple of things. First, it's a fantastic dinosaur book for kids 9 to 12 about dinosaur soft tissue -- skin, muscle, frills, organs -- fossilized and preserved along with our old favorites, dinosaur bones. But it's called DINOSAUR MUMMIES: BEYOND BARE-BONE FOSSILS, not DINOSAUR MUMMIES: BEYOND-BARE FOSSILS. And it was illustrated by Rick C. Spears, not Ricky Spears. And it will be released in August of 2003, not September. Other than that, you got a pretty good picture of what's to come. And it's a Junior Library Guild selection for 2003. I hope you love it as much as I loved writing it.