Read an Excerpt
  COYOTE NATION
 SEXUALITY, RACE, AND CONQUEST IN MODERNIZING NEW MEXICO 1880-1920 
 By PABLO MITCHELL  THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS 
 Copyright © 2005  
 The University of Chicago 
All right reserved. 
 ISBN: 978-0-226-53242-4     
 Chapter One                                 INTRODUCTION                                  BODIES ON BORDERS  
  
  In steps both utterly familiar and strangely new, several thousand travelers  climbed off the train into the strong sun and thin air and strange  accents of New Mexico between 1880 and 1920. At the railroad depot, such  settlers-immigrants from Europe and Asia, African Americans from the  North and South, and native American white, almost white, and never to  be white-met the settled of New Mexico for the first time. Undoubtedly  there was much mulling about and mutual gawking and misfired queries.  Undoubtedly some Iowans saw their first Indians, and some Indians their  first Iowans, and some Iowans their first Hispanos who looked like Indians  but were actually Hispanos, and so on.  
     After days aboard the transcontinental railroad, what else did these  travelers discover? What did they see? What did they smell? How did they  smell? What prompted these travelers to unload their bags in turn-of-the-twentieth-century  New Mexico? What vistas did they leave behind  and what dreads and delights did they encounter upon arrival? And what  of the settled in New Mexico: the Hispanos and Pueblos and Navajo and  Zuni and Apache, the African Americans and Asian Americans and Anglos?  What fits and starts shook them when the train whistle blew?  
     Such were the questions that emerged when the railroad arrived in  1880. New Mexicans, new and old, converged at a time and place of great  upheaval. It was in New Mexico where the forces of modernity and imperialism  met with a special intensity. The arrival of the railroad in New  Mexico brought increased integration into national markets and an  unprecedented flow of mostly Anglo immigrants to the territory from  throughout the United States and Europe. New Mexico's population  jumped from 120,000 in 1880 to nearly 200,000 in 1900 and 360,000 in  1920. While Hispano leading families scrambled to maintain their status,  new elites rose to prominence in the growing towns of Albuquerque,  Las Vegas, and Santa Fe. These emergent elites, mostly Anglo but with a  sprinkling of Hispanos, utilized new techniques and strategies in the consolidation  of power. Increasingly, the informal, mostly Hispano-Indian  traditions governing interpersonal relationships, land use, and the transfer  of property gave way to more formal, rationalized methods of interaction  and control. This transition, actually the emergence of a modern  New Mexico, appeared in countless guises, from the meticulous surveying  and distribution of the land and legal realms, to the explicit regulation of  personal behavior through science and medicine, mass consumer culture,  gender patterns, and education.  
     The American railroad and railroad systems also brought together  Indian, Hispano, and Anglo peoples for the first time in a modern and  modernizing setting. Contemporary accounts echo this unprecedented  convergence in New Mexico. Imagine Hopi Indian Polingaysi Qoyawayma's  first encounter with a railroad in the early twentieth century.  "Trains rumbled and screeched along the rails that bisected the town,"  she remembered, "accompanied by a clickety-clacking sound, unfamiliar  yet interesting." Charles Brown recalled that the train ride into Rincon,  in northern New Mexico, inspired flights of "myth and folklore," with  images of "tall, spare crosses" and the "ruins of an old church." Ernest  Peixotto writes of his first visit to Albuquerque, "The Isleta women sit  by the station, and are familiar figures to all transcontinental travelers.  And, indeed, they make a brilliant group against the well-planned background  of the great depot, whose long procession of grey arcades with  their pottery roofs and bell-towers tell vividly against the turquoise sky."  
     Like Brown and Peixotto, Americans throughout the period disembarked  in newly conquered lands in the nineteenth and early twentieth  centuries. After all, the most precious cargo upon the trains heading westward  were the soldiers and military personnel who also entered the West  aboard the nation's railways. Between 1848 and 1898, American military  victories led to the annexation of 1,274,187 square miles of territory. The  United States ballooned in size, from 2,463,603 square miles to 3,737,790  square miles. In 1848, in the aftermath of the Mexican-American War,  the United States annexed 530,000 square miles of Mexican land, territory  that would eventually become the states of California, Arizona, Nevada,  Utah, New Mexico, and part of Colorado. After 1848, Americans flooded  into the formerly Mexican land. In the next half century, the region was  steadily incorporated into developing U.S. political, economic, and legal  systems.  
     Between 1850 and 1900, those of Mexican origin (either born in Mexico  or American born of Mexican descent) suffered great losses: in land, in  wealth, in status, in political power, even in percentage of the population.  By one estimate, in 1900 the Mexican-origin population in California,  which had been predominant in the state prior to the Mexican-American  War, was 48,579, or 3.2 percent of the state's population. Texas was similar,  with Mexican-origin peoples accounting for 198,841, or about 6.5 percent  of the total state population. Native Americans throughout the West suffered  similar losses. In California the devastation was especially horrific  as the Indian population plummeted from approximately 150,000 in 1845  to 16,000 in 1880. By 1910 over 60 percent of the original indigenous tribes  had disappeared.  
     Unkempt and volatile, the American railroad was none other than the  ultimate agent of American modernity and imperialism. Modernity is, at  its most basic, a collapsing of time and space into new sets of measurable  relationships. Modernity differs from earlier periods in several important  respects. In a major break from previous eras, the time required to  manufacture a broad array of products was dramatically shortened. To  take one of a great many available examples, a new cigarette-making machine  in the 1880s produced seven thousand cigarettes per hour. Human  workers could at the time produce far less, only three thousand cigarettes  in a full day. The time required to "disassemble" products was similarly  slashed, as meat producers developed new, far more efficient production  lines devoted to the processing and packaging of goods. According to one  account, the annual production of goods jumped by $2 billon in 1865 to  $13 billion in 1900 as the United States came to lead the world in productivity.  In modernity, spatial divides proved as outdated as previous  notions of time. With the railroad, the local became national, with newly  elaborate timetables, schedules, and maps that brought Americans within  hours and days rather than weeks and months of each other. Railroads  also carried to new lands a stunning variety of consumer goods. Stoves,  pianos, watches, and fashionable clothing poured into region after region  as railroads incorporated broad swaths of the country into an expanding  national market.  
     In this modern eclipsing of time and space, new relationships emerged  between individuals, communities, and institutions. At the forefront were  changing gender roles and transforming relationships between men and  women, husbands and wives. Suffrage movements, increasing educational  opportunities for young women, and widespread female criticism  of male behavior ranging from alcohol consumption to sexual promiscuity  to political corruption led to new "modern" forms of appropriate  femininity and masculinity. New relationships between professionals also  emerged as professional organizations of lawyers, doctors, and university  professors-complete with bylaws, licensing, and standards of conduct-formed  in the modern era. These new affiliations, often national and regional,  replaced older local relationships between townspeople. A lawyer  from Albany increasingly had more in common with attorneys in Albuquerque  than with fellow Albanyites. New modern measurement techniques,  based on developing sciences, sought to categorize and classify  many of these relationships and were especially noticeable in the new  racial and sexual sciences that created elaborate scientific hierarchies of  racial groups and sexual types.  
     The rise of modernity was not alone in transforming the American nation.  From the end of the Mexican-American War in 1848 to the aftermath  of the Spanish-American War in 1898 (where the United States seized the  previously Spanish colonies of Puerto Rico, Cuba, Guam, and the Philippines),  Americans followed military conquest with the establishment of  U.S. political and economic institutions. While scholars have traditionally  reserved the term "imperialism"-the attempted extension of rule  or influence by one government, nation, or society over another-to describe  post-1898 American intervention in foreign countries, the notion,  as I will demonstrate in the following chapters, applies to the American  Southwest as well. So, too, is colonialism, the always-contested political  and economic control over an area by an occupying force, an apt description  of the American domination of both New Mexico and Cuba, Puerto  Rico, and the Philippines.  
     Indeed, the similarities between New Mexico and other colonial regimes  like Puerto Rico are striking. Native New Mexicans proved especially  resilient in the face of Anglo incursions. In 1900 New Mexicans of  Mexican origin constituted nearly 50 percent of the population (93,356 of  195,310). Moreover, despite the substantial influx of Anglo-Americans,  Hispanos continued to hold considerable political power, wealth, and status,  and Hispano culture still persisted, if not flourished, in New Mexico  as a great many New Mexicans continued to speak Spanish and identify  proudly with their Hispano heritage. Indians (Pueblo, Navajo, Ute,  and Apache) similarly retained relative power and numbers in New Mexico.  More than fifteen thousand Indians lived in New Mexico in 1880,  comprising almost 10 percent of the population. By 1920 almost twenty  thousand lived in the state. In light of such imposing demographics, the  establishment of racial order in New Mexico presented challenges that  American colonizers in Puerto Rico and throughout imperial America  would have found most familiar. As the subsequent chapters will make  clear, the roots of American imperialism are deep in New Mexico.  
     In this exceptional land, where modernity and imperialism met in an  unprecedented manner, Anglo newcomers faced a peculiar dilemma. In  order to achieve statehood and the rights of full citizenship (until 1912,  when New Mexico became a state, even the most elite Anglo man in New  Mexico, no matter the purity of his lineage or the excellence of his ability,  was barred from voting for president or running for governor), Anglos  would have to prove to the rest of the country that New Mexico was  worthy of full membership in the American political system. Principally,  Anglos would have to demonstrate that social order in New Mexico had  been established, and that New Mexicans, especially Hispanos and Indians,  could be transformed into Americans. This, of course, was a demanding  task, turning what a great many outside New Mexico considered  "mongrel land" into a true American state. I will argue that central to this  project of re-creating New Mexico's social structure, and transforming  New Mexicans into Americans, was the human body. As I will demonstrate,  the human body's entrances and exits, protrusions and blemishes,  incapacities, shames, triumphs, failures, and desires together constituted  an overlooked, yet absolutely critical, component of the creation of American  colonial order in New Mexico.  
     Bodily comportment was an integral piece of Anglo efforts to claim  that Indians and Hispanos were socially inferior and not white. This  racialization process (which I will describe more precisely later in the  chapter) proceeded along many fronts. In chapters 2 and 3, I will concentrate  on two sites of particular interest, U.S. Indian schools and trials for  sexual assault, where the racially different status of Indians and Hispanos  was articulated. Wealthy Hispanos, like colonial elites throughout the  world, however, posed a significant challenge to this racialization project.  As chapters 4 and 5 will explain, the continuing political and economic  power of Hispanos forced Anglos to abandon wholesale denunciations of  "native" New Mexicans and focus instead on bodily comportment as an  index of social status. To claim whiteness, however, Anglos in New Mexico  could not simply racialize Indians and Hispanos as nonwhite; they would  have to assert their own whiteness as well, in effect racialize themselves as  white. Chapters 6 and 7 will describe precisely this process of the creation  of whiteness, focusing on the bodily comportment of Anglos in medicine  and consumer space.  
     Before elaborating on my argument, two terms deserve some clarification:  whiteness and citizenship. Far more than light skin or blue  eyes, whiteness is the historically specific melding of physical characteristics  (which could include, based on historical context, hair length, body  composition-as in fatness or skinniness-skin tone and texture, volume  and quality of speech, practices of consumption of food and liquid, and  elimination, as well as light skin) with economic and political power.  David Roediger and George Lipsitz have described the economic benefits  accruing to those managing to claim whiteness. The "cash value" (Lipsitz)  or "wages" (Roediger) of whiteness vary based on historical context, but  are nonetheless substantial. The political power of whiteness similarly  shifts depending on context, but generally equates the physical characteristics  of being "white" with voting rights, civic leadership, and legal  protections.  
     While citizenship is similarly complicated, it is, at its base, about belonging.  National citizenship designates citizens in a political sense, as  those individuals who have rights, like voting, and obligations, like jury  duty or military service. Other definitions of citizenship, beyond a strictly  legalistic interpretation, are broader, encompassing a more full membership  in a society. This understanding of citizenship can vary based on the  setting and historical context, but at its core views citizens as those members  of a society who command respectful and dignified treatment in the  most basic aspects of their lives: choice of occupation, residence, choice  of spouse or sexual partner, style of noncoercive personal pleasure. Those  with power and authority in certain settings-like police officers, school  principals, government officials, store clerks, and librarians-treat such  individuals, such citizens, with care, rather than suspicion and alarm. Citizenship,  according to this broader understanding, describes those individuals  that society values and protects. Citizenship, to offer some specific  examples, includes those who control material resources; whose ideas receive  attention and respect; who walk the streets and enter businesses  without special scrutiny; whose economic and political activities find favor  in the courts, banks, and newspapers; whose births, marriages, and  deaths are reported in the press; whose ailments find speedy and dignified  treatment; whose children's peccadilloes amuse rather than enrage the judiciary;  whose labor is acknowledged and well rewarded; whose tragedies  are made not the stuff of jokes, but of sympathy; whose sex lives remain  discreetly hidden. In this book, I will rely upon this latter, broader definition  of citizenship.  
  (Continues...)  
  
     
 
 Excerpted from COYOTE NATION by PABLO MITCHELL  Copyright © 2005   by The University of Chicago.   Excerpted by permission.
 All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.