Evil or Ill?: Justifying the Insanity Defence
Lawrie Reznek addresses these questions and more in his controversial investigation of the insanity defense in Evil or Ill? Drawing from countless intriguing case examples, he aims to understand the concept of an excuse, and explains why the law excuses certain actions and not others. In his easily accessible and elegant style, he explains that in law, there exists two excuses derived from Aristotle: the excuses of ignorance and compulsion. Reznek, however proposes a third excuse - the excuse of character change. In introducing this third excuse, Reznek raises a controversial possibility - the abolition of the insanity defence.
1128409425
Evil or Ill?: Justifying the Insanity Defence
Lawrie Reznek addresses these questions and more in his controversial investigation of the insanity defense in Evil or Ill? Drawing from countless intriguing case examples, he aims to understand the concept of an excuse, and explains why the law excuses certain actions and not others. In his easily accessible and elegant style, he explains that in law, there exists two excuses derived from Aristotle: the excuses of ignorance and compulsion. Reznek, however proposes a third excuse - the excuse of character change. In introducing this third excuse, Reznek raises a controversial possibility - the abolition of the insanity defence.
190.0
In Stock
5
1
Evil or Ill?: Justifying the Insanity Defence
342
Evil or Ill?: Justifying the Insanity Defence
342
190.0
In Stock
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9780415166997 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
| Publication date: | 10/02/1997 |
| Series: | Philosophical Issues in Science , #9 |
| Pages: | 342 |
| Product dimensions: | 5.44(w) x 8.50(h) x (d) |
About the Author
From the B&N Reads Blog