- Shopping Bag ( 0 items )
Want a NOOK? Explore Now
Why the year 1968? Because it did rock the world. In addition to being the height of the Vietnam War, and the Biafran war, with the Middle East close to igniting global warfare and an incident with Korea holding a U.S. ship leading to a year-long tense negotiation, it was a year of tremendous social upheaval almost everywhere in the world -- in countries as diverse as China, Japan, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Italy, Germany, France, the United States, and Mexico.
The central question of my book 1968: The Year that Rocked the World is why did all of this happen in so many countries at the same time? The answer lies in the intersection of a number of historical forces at a time when television was just coming of age. Four of the most world-changing events in the history of television were in 1968: the coverage of the Vietnam War's Tet Offensive, bringing filmed battle into homes the same evening; the police brutality at the Chicago Convention being filmed and aired that night; smuggled film proving that the Soviets were invading Czechoslovakia without any local support and completely against the will of the Czech people; and the dazzling trick of broadcasting astronauts from outer space. In 1968 the world tumbled into a media age that only a few people understood. It was the awkward beginning of the world we live in today. But that is only one of the consequences of that pivotal year, a year of such grave seed changes that 35 years later we are only beginning to understand them.
It is now clear that the Soviet suppression of students in Poland and the invasion of Czechoslovakia were the beginning of the end of the Soviet Union. These events alienated an entire generation of young Communists. Communism was supposed to be a system for changing the world and building a better society. But in 1968 it became clear to loyal Communists that the Soviets not only were no longer interested in change, they would not allow it. They had taken away the best reason to be a Communist. It was the year that took France out of the 19th century. It was the year that Mexicans began resisting one-party rule; the recent nonviolent overthrow of the ruling party began with the massacred students of 1968.
In the United States nothing in politics has been the same since 1968. In that year Richard Nixon, who had the reputation of being a perennial loser and represented a party that had only one winning candidate since the Depression, reconfigured American politics to win the presidency and lay out a strategy followed by every Republican candidate since. Nixon realized that millions of Democratic voters, especially in the South, had been alienated by the civil rights movement. The 2004 Republican Party is a party designed by Nixon and unrecognizable to pre-Nixon Republicans. Nixon also changed the Supreme Court, deliberately packing it with anticivil rights judges, including William Rhenquist, who worked in Nixon's attorney general's office as the legal adviser for a dirty tricks campaign that tried to sabotage liberal judges, starting with Abe Fortas in 1968.
The military certainly learned many things from 1968. The draft was abolished and is unlikely to return, because it creates activist college campuses. The practice of giving body counts was dropped. During the Vietnam War, the U.S. military gave regular counts of the number of enemy killed. They may have even exaggerated the numbers. But this killing sickened people, and so the bloodless war was invented. How many people have U.S. forces killed in Afghanistan? In Iraq? No precise figures are available.
Media was so effective in 1968 because its power was not fully understood. Today it is, and the news is packaged with an eye toward public opinion in a sophisticated manner that was only in its early stages then. And government has become far more skilled at controlling news, especially war news. Journalists are not free to roam Iraq and Afghanistan the way they were in Vietnam but are generally kept in controlled situations. The journalists themselves could learn much from 1968 by studying the way the press corps at the time came to understand that they were being lied to and found a new independence that allowed the public to learn the truth about the war.
Lastly, in a world in which people are feeling disenfranchised by the power of government and corporate-controlled news, there is much to be learned from 1968, when people made themselves heard on the streets. Mark Kurlansky
1. How did the explosive worldwide social movements of 1968 make that year unique?
2. What was the international impact of the civil rights movement on the events of 1968?
3. What progress or setbacks have there been in the status of women since that time?
4. How did television influence that year’s events?
5. How does the mass media of today differ from 1968’s?
6. What was the global significance of the Prague Spring?
7. What events of 1968 would not occur today?
8. How is it that such a tragic year arouses nostalgia in so many people?
9. Was the world a better place before 1968, or do you feel there have been changes for the better since that year?
10. What lessons might we learn from the events of 1968?
Anonymous
Posted January 13, 2005
I tried to read this book. I think that the topic is great; the reviews are fantastic; everything made it seem like it would be great. It stinks. Despite the cohesion implied by the title, the book is little more than a long string of anecdotal news reports around the general them of rebellion. Even so, the book strays often. Despite the glowing reviews of some respected and intelligent people, I think that the book is a waste of time.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted June 9, 2004
The twelve months of 1968 represented a major turning point in the social and political development of many countries worldwide. Kurlansky has written an absorbing book on a pivotal year. While he covers what happened in a lot of countries and provides considerable information about the trend of unrest experienced in diverse societies, it's a launching pad for further study. A worthwhile read.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 20, 2004
This book rocks. I was only 10 years old in 1968, so didn't know a teeny fraction of the information this author presents. The book is informative, raucous, unrestrained in its honesty, and at times funny. (Am I the only one who thinks this book portrays Abbie Hoffman as wonderfully buffoonish? The 60's guru comes across--at times laughably--as an idiot.) At any rate, I loved this book and learned much about world politics and the true legacies of the 1960s.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful? Yes NoThank you for your feedback. Report this reviewThank you, this review has been flagged.Anonymous
Posted April 5, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Anonymous
Posted July 12, 2011
No text was provided for this review.
Overview
With 1968, Mark Kurlansky brings to teeming life the cultural and political history of that world-changing year of social upheaval. People think of it as the year of sex, drugs, and rock and roll. Yet it was also the year of the Martin Luther King Jr. and Bobby ...